BBO Discussion Forums: Where are we going ? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Where are we going ?

#1 User is offline   wanoff 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 354
  • Joined: 2012-February-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Birmingham,UK

Posted 2013-August-30, 13:10



Acol, 4cd majors, RKCB

Any ideas what 4NT might be ?
0

#2 User is offline   anzin 

  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3
  • Joined: 2007-June-18
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ukraine
  • Interests:backgammon

Posted 2013-August-30, 14:50

I read it this way: 2=4th suit game forcing, 3= agreeing trumps slam try, thus 4NT=Blackwood
0

#3 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2013-August-30, 15:19

agree with the above, it is not really needed but for me 3 is 100% fit.
0

#4 User is online   Cyberyeti 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,250
  • Joined: 2009-July-13
  • Location:England

Posted 2013-August-30, 16:22

This entirely depends if you play kickback. If 4 asks for aces then 4N is voidwood in spades if you play this otherwise quantitative, otherwise it's keycard IMO.

How you bid xxxx, Ax, Ax, AKQJx is not clear to me however.
0

#5 User is offline   mgoetze 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,942
  • Joined: 2005-January-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cologne, Germany
  • Interests:Sleeping, Eating

Posted 2013-August-30, 17:15

View PostCyberyeti, on 2013-August-30, 16:22, said:

This entirely depends if you play kickback.

Uhm... I would suggest you give serious consideration to discussing things like whether 3 here guarantees a fit before introducing kickback to your partnership. I mean, sheesh Yeti, do you really think this answer is helping anyone?

Whether 2 guarantees 5 hearts depends which flavour of ACOL you play but 3 surely must show 5-5, so I would agree that 3 sets trumps and 4NT is therefore RKCB.
"One of the painful things about our time is that those who feel certainty are stupid, and those with any imagination and understanding are filled with doubt and indecision"
    -- Bertrand Russell
2

#6 User is online   Cyberyeti 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,250
  • Joined: 2009-July-13
  • Location:England

Posted 2013-August-30, 17:54

View Postmgoetze, on 2013-August-30, 17:15, said:

Uhm... I would suggest you give serious consideration to discussing things like whether 3 here guarantees a fit before introducing kickback to your partnership. I mean, sheesh Yeti, do you really think this answer is helping anyone?

Whether 2 guarantees 5 hearts depends which flavour of ACOL you play but 3 surely must show 5-5, so I would agree that 3 sets trumps and 4NT is therefore RKCB.


Well if you ever under any circumstances play kickback, 4 is clearly that so 4N is something else.

What do you do with a 4 small 225 18-19 with Hx or HH hearts ? I agree 3 suggests playing in hearts, but am not sure it categorically guarantees a "proper" fit.

2 guarantees 5 in most forms of Acol, 3 absolutely confirms 5-5.

I think with a pickup partner I just give my "2 without" 5 response which is unlikely to cause too much trouble if misinterpreted.
0

#7 User is offline   wanoff 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 354
  • Joined: 2012-February-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Birmingham,UK

Posted 2013-September-01, 06:52

View PostFluffy, on 2013-August-30, 15:19, said:

agree with the above, it is not really needed but for me 3 is 100% fit.


I'm not disagreeing just curious.
Does that mean showing 5-3 heart fit at the 3 level is more important than the right strain ?
I'm thinking of the possible 6-2 heart fit when spades might not be that well stopped.
0

#8 User is offline   cherdano 

  • 5555
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,519
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2013-September-02, 06:48

Is everyone assuming a version of ACOL where 3 one round earlier (1H-2C-2D-3H) is non-forcing? Otherwise it would be crazy IMO to play 3 in the given auction as promising a fit. Are we really delaying the forcing raise with 3-card support to cater for the rare hand where opener is 4441??
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
0

#9 User is online   Cyberyeti 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,250
  • Joined: 2009-July-13
  • Location:England

Posted 2013-September-02, 07:20

View Postcherdano, on 2013-September-02, 06:48, said:

Is everyone assuming a version of ACOL where 3 one round earlier (1H-2C-2D-3H) is non-forcing? Otherwise it would be crazy IMO to play 3 in the given auction as promising a fit. Are we really delaying the forcing raise with 3-card support to cater for the rare hand where opener is 4441??


This may not even be possible, while quite a few people open 1 with 4441, also plenty don't (we open 1).
0

#10 User is offline   gordontd 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,485
  • Joined: 2009-July-14
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London

Posted 2013-September-02, 12:00

View Postcherdano, on 2013-September-02, 06:48, said:

Is everyone assuming a version of ACOL where 3 one round earlier (1H-2C-2D-3H) is non-forcing?

Is there another version?
Gordon Rainsford
London UK
0

#11 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2013-September-02, 15:21

View PostCyberyeti, on 2013-August-30, 16:22, said:

How you bid xxxx, Ax, Ax, AKQJx is not clear to me however.


If we just had a bid with no natural purposes below 3NT to spare...
0

#12 User is offline   fromageGB 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,679
  • Joined: 2008-April-06

Posted 2013-September-03, 14:56

Cyberyeti is right to raise the possibility of kickback, because this is the IA forum, and if you are playing it 4NT can be spades voidwood.

But go back a bit. I take it the 2 limited opener's hand to say less than 17, so what is 3? If responder had 3 hearts he could just bid game or ace ask. If responder has 3 hearts, 3 is therefore inviting a cue bid, and 3 is the standout continuation on the hand. That wasn't bid, suggesting that cue bidding is not in the curriculum. So probably 3 shows just a doubleton, in case opener had 6, and 3NT is a suggestion to play. Therefore 4NT is inviting 6NT if opener has a 15 count.

If I was in this situation I pass.
0

#13 User is offline   PhilG007 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 973
  • Joined: 2013-February-24
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Dundee Scotland United Kingdom
  • Interests:Occasional chess player. Dominoes

Posted 2013-September-04, 01:40

View PostfromageGB, on 2013-September-03, 14:56, said:

Cyberyeti is right to raise the possibility of kickback, because this is the IA forum, and if you are playing it 4NT can be spades voidwood.

But go back a bit. I take it the 2 limited opener's hand to say less than 17, so what is 3? If responder had 3 hearts he could just bid game or ace ask. If responder has 3 hearts, 3 is therefore inviting a cue bid, and 3 is the standout continuation on the hand. That wasn't bid, suggesting that cue bidding is not in the curriculum. So probably 3 shows just a doubleton, in case opener had 6, and 3NT is a suggestion to play. Therefore 4NT is inviting 6NT if opener has a 15 count.

If I was in this situation I pass.

Why go into NTs when a trump fit has been found????? The singleton club is an asset in a trump contract as a ruffing value
and a liability in NTs.
"It is not enough to be a good player, you must also play well"
- Dr Tarrasch(1862-1934)German Chess Grandmaster

Bridge is a game where you have two opponents...and often three(!)


"Any palooka can take tricks with Aces and Kings; the true expert shows his prowess
by how he handles the two's and three's" - Mollo's Hideous Hog
0

#14 User is offline   wank 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,866
  • Joined: 2008-July-13

Posted 2013-September-04, 04:34

even playing acol 3h is played as forcing as far as i'm concerned. 3h was just looking for a 6th heart or spade stop then and this is quantitative.
0

#15 User is offline   fromageGB 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,679
  • Joined: 2008-April-06

Posted 2013-September-04, 09:38

View PostPhilG007, on 2013-September-04, 01:40, said:

Why go into NTs when a trump fit has been found????? The singleton club is an asset in a trump contract as a ruffing value
and a liability in NTs.

I am attempting to decipher the bidding. If 3NT is natural, and not a spade cue when 3 would be the "serious 3NT" when hearts are trumps, then there is no good fit. North has black suit lengths equivalent to South's reds, and the strength to go with it, more strength than South.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

7 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 7 guests, 0 anonymous users