Page 1 of 1
Forcing or Non-Forcing 3D?
#2
Posted 2013-August-16, 17:17
Almost forcing. This is an invitation to game in spades based on the existence of a possible double fit in diamonds. I suppose it can be passed with an absolute minimum with only 3 spades.
EDIT: I take that back; mike777 has a good point. Well, I might gamble and pass the bid with an absolute dreck, but I'd think of that as passing a forcing bid against agreements.
EDIT: I take that back; mike777 has a good point. Well, I might gamble and pass the bid with an absolute dreck, but I'd think of that as passing a forcing bid against agreements.
#4
Posted 2013-August-18, 17:19
Well, I doubt a beginner partner would dare try 3♦ if he had a slam try.
Therefore I support akwoo's original answer.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/76e7c/76e7c83357a8810ac6243165f60c4989ee4e25a1" alt=";)"
"One of the painful things about our time is that those who feel certainty are stupid, and those with any imagination and understanding are filled with doubt and indecision"
-- Bertrand Russell
-- Bertrand Russell
#8
Posted 2013-August-19, 09:10
While the suggested rule that all ABBA auctions should be forcing is a good one, there is a difference between auctions where A is a minor and where A is a major. If A is a minor then the sequence should always be forcing. If A is a major then you can agree for it to be forcing too but the default in many systems is not-forcing (showing a 3 card limit raise with a good side suit). Of course, many systems have 1M - 2m; 3m show extras, and in that case the default there is obviously forcing too.
(-: Zel :-)
Page 1 of 1