Granted that in robot tourneys it is strictly the other humans against whom you are competing, I am nevertheless interested in opinions on whether GIB plays a stronger game at MP than at IMP, or vice versa, or too close to call.
Is there any way of measuring it? What say all y'all?
For what it's worth I personally think that its IMP game is stronger, but it is only gut feel.
Page 1 of 1
MP or IMP, where is GIB stronger?
#1
Posted 2013-July-20, 12:19
Psych (pron. saik): A gross and deliberate misstatement of honour strength and/or suit length. Expressly permitted under Law 73E but forbidden contrary to that law by Acol club tourneys.
Psyche (pron. sahy-kee): The human soul, spirit or mind (derived, personification thereof, beloved of Eros, Greek myth).
Masterminding (pron. mstr-mnding) tr. v. - Any bid made by bridge player with which partner disagrees.
"Gentlemen, when the barrage lifts." 9th battalion, King's own Yorkshire light infantry,
2000 years earlier: "morituri te salutant"
"I will be with you, whatever". Blair to Bush, precursor to invasion of Iraq
Psyche (pron. sahy-kee): The human soul, spirit or mind (derived, personification thereof, beloved of Eros, Greek myth).
Masterminding (pron. mstr-mnding) tr. v. - Any bid made by bridge player with which partner disagrees.
"Gentlemen, when the barrage lifts." 9th battalion, King's own Yorkshire light infantry,
2000 years earlier: "morituri te salutant"
"I will be with you, whatever". Blair to Bush, precursor to invasion of Iraq
#2
Posted 2013-July-20, 14:13
I rarely play with robots but robot simulations should help at MPs because of the importance of gain-frequency. Also robots' ability to keep focussed should help at pairs because each board is of equal importance. Nevertheless, MPs is a more testing game of skill, so I agree with 1eyedjack that they should do better at imps.
#3
Posted 2013-July-20, 21:07
LOL. Perhaps a better question is whether they even have different behavior in the different forms of the game.
#4
Posted 2013-July-20, 21:28
There are more factors involved in matchpoint games that can play a key role in the outcome than at IMPS. For example, correct defense that holds a hand to -620 as opposed to -650 is huge at matchpoints but is only worth 1 IMP at IMPs. While GIB is well programmed on many of the important decisions, there are a fair number of key factors at IMPs that GIB is not well programmed for.
Therefore, GIB is tougher at matchpoints than IMPs.
Therefore, GIB is tougher at matchpoints than IMPs.
Page 1 of 1