BBO Discussion Forums: sandwich x - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

sandwich x

Poll: sandwich x (28 member(s) have cast votes)

with which shapes do you X here (assuming you have at most 16 hcp)?

  1. 1444 (27 votes [21.09%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 21.09%

  2. 2443 (27 votes [21.09%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 21.09%

  3. 3442 (25 votes [19.53%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 19.53%

  4. 4441 (23 votes [17.97%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 17.97%

  5. 2434 (14 votes [10.94%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 10.94%

  6. 3433 (6 votes [4.69%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 4.69%

  7. 2344 (4 votes [3.12%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 3.12%

  8. 3244 (1 votes [0.78%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 0.78%

  9. 5044 (1 votes [0.78%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 0.78%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2013-May-01, 03:04

1C-p-1S-?

1NT would be natural, 16-18 or thereabouts. 1C is better minor, but please comment on whether this makes a big difference w.r.t. your agreements.

Clarification: if you select on 3433 you are saying that with some 3433's you would double (e.g. maybe you would x on most 1444 11-counts but you require at least 15 points and no stop to double with 3433). I didn't put in 54/45 hands for simplicity and because I forgot. Too bad.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#2 User is offline   cherdano 

  • 5555
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,519
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2013-May-01, 06:54

Looks I am the only one doubling with 2344 so far. I would hate to pass with xx AKx AKQx xxxx. Is anyone really going to pass this? Bid 1NT?
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
0

#3 User is offline   awm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,383
  • Joined: 2005-February-09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Zurich, Switzerland

Posted 2013-May-01, 09:07

4-4 in the reds seems obvious with opening points. With 4-3 I will still double if I have a bit stronger hand like 14+.
Adam W. Meyerson
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
0

#4 User is offline   JLOGIC 

  • 2011 Poster of The Year winner
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,002
  • Joined: 2010-July-08
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2013-May-01, 14:31

I recently had a thought while doubling on a defensivey 3433 15 count that it was wrong since I would also double with a 5-5 8 count so it covers too much ground. My partner jumped to 3H and we got to a game.

Anyways, I think the 4 trip hands are overrated in this kind of auction, it's not the same as 1x X where it's awesome. But it's still probably worthwhile. Part of the problem is even when you are on for 3N you often won't get there since partner isn't just gonna 2N on some 10 or 11 count.
0

#5 User is offline   JLOGIC 

  • 2011 Poster of The Year winner
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,002
  • Joined: 2010-July-08
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2013-May-01, 14:33

Also should mention I overcall very light which makes it less necessary to X to compete for a partscore. The sounder you overcall the better Xing is probably.

Dunno why I'm giving all the arguments for not doing something that I always do heh.
0

#6 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2013-May-02, 01:35

4 trip hand? is that 4441?
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#7 User is offline   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,260
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2013-May-02, 02:15

With 44 in the unbid suit, I will make the X most of the time.

I am sure, this helps brilliant declarers, but until I play regular against those, I go with the X,
fighting for the part score as deerly as I can.

Colors do matter, honor distribution as well.

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#8 User is offline   JLOGIC 

  • 2011 Poster of The Year winner
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,002
  • Joined: 2010-July-08
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2013-May-02, 05:09

 gwnn, on 2013-May-02, 01:35, said:

4 trip hand? is that 4441?


4 triple 3 aka 4333 aka 4 trip over here sometimes. 4441 is often known as "4 by 1" lol.
0

#9 User is offline   WellSpyder 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,627
  • Joined: 2009-November-30
  • Location:Oxfordshire, England

Posted 2013-May-02, 05:27

 JLOGIC, on 2013-May-02, 05:09, said:

4441 is often known as "4 by 1" lol.

Why not trip 4, I wonder?
0

#10 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2013-May-02, 05:27

I've never heard a 4333 shape described as "awesome" before.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#11 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2013-May-02, 05:31

Gnasher you wrote in a different thread that you just play this x as takeout of spades, is that true? So specifically 4441 is, I guess, not an option normally? But 2434 is fine even without particular extras?
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#12 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2013-May-02, 05:44

 gwnn, on 2013-May-02, 05:31, said:

Gnasher you wrote in a different thread that you just play this x as takeout of spades, is that true? So specifically 4441 is, I guess, not an option normally? But 2434 is fine even without particular extras?


No, I said that when the 1 opening is 2+ I play it as takeout of spades. Against a 3+ club I think it should be takeout of spades and clubs.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#13 User is offline   Phil 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,092
  • Joined: 2008-December-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:North Texas, USA
  • Interests:Mountain Biking

Posted 2013-May-02, 09:48

3 cards in the unbid suits is my initial criteria. Even with 4trip if I'm stacked in the reds, double looks fine: xxx AKxx AKx xxx?
Hi y'all!

Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
0

#14 User is offline   aguahombre 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,029
  • Joined: 2009-February-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St. George, UT

Posted 2013-May-02, 10:02

I think if the "2+" is just the possibility opener has 4=4=3=2 (the treatment now deemed natural over here), we should not bother discerning and make the double a takeout of the blacks. If we consider frequency, when opener has any other distribution we will be more likely to hold a red takeout; and conversely when opener does have that one rare 2-card club opening, we are less likely to hold a 4-4 red takeout and when we do, it is less likely to be a successful intervention.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
0

#15 User is offline   Siegmund 

  • Alchemist
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,764
  • Joined: 2004-June-15
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Beside a little lake in northwestern Montana
  • Interests:Creator of the 'grbbridge' LaTeX typesetting package.

Posted 2013-May-02, 19:03

I like playing this double as takeout of spades even if 1C is completely natural - X, 1NT, and 2NT are more ways than we need to show the same two suits - though playing a strong notrump in this spot does provide an incentive to put more 4-5s back into the double, and is perhaps an excuse to go back to playing the double as a two-suit takeout.
0

#16 User is offline   Winstonm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,285
  • Joined: 2005-January-08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tulsa, Oklahoma
  • Interests:Art, music

Posted 2013-May-03, 10:59

This is an interesting auction as a number of bids need some kind of agreement. If you plunk in sandswich NT, you have all sorts of bids available to show all sorts of shape/strength. To wit, 1C-P-1S-(X, 1NT, 2C, 2S, 2N) are all available for takeout. The question to resolve is what is best.
"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere."
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users