A quick sanity check. IMPs scoring.
Yay or nay?
#1
Posted 2013-April-25, 18:43
A quick sanity check. IMPs scoring.
#5
Posted 2013-April-26, 03:25
#6
Posted 2013-April-26, 04:43
#8
Posted 2013-April-26, 06:34
-gwnn
#9
Posted 2013-April-26, 08:40
What is baby oil made of?
#10
Posted 2013-April-27, 10:05
#12
Posted 2013-May-01, 07:34
#13
Posted 2013-May-09, 18:10
#14
Posted 2013-May-10, 00:30
#15
Posted 2013-May-10, 00:33
broze, on 2013-May-09, 18:10, said:
And that's because partner's 4♦ bid was the sane thing to do?
#16
Posted 2013-May-10, 05:15
Free, on 2013-May-10, 00:33, said:
This was the full hand:
I couldn't really fault partner for 4♦ (although probably dbl has something going for it) and agreed in the post-mortem that I was probs a bit light but I really thought it was a lot closer than the poll suggests! E.g. If the A♠ was in any other suit it would be clear to bid; any other vul I would surely pass.
#17
Posted 2013-May-10, 08:16
dirext----the opps are vul and if the bidding goes 2s p 3s p p both opps are weak
since they didnt try for a vul game------------- the direct x has a much greater risk
vs reward--lho is unlimited you could be facing a xx and a sledge hammer awaiting
you and you have very few values to compete on the 3 level not vulnerable does
not mean invulnerable.