BBO Discussion Forums: When is the weaker hand allowed to take control of the auction? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 3 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

When is the weaker hand allowed to take control of the auction?

#1 User is offline   32519 

  • Insane 2-Diamond Bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,471
  • Joined: 2010-December-22
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Mpumalanga, South Africa
  • Interests:Books, bridge, philately

Posted 2013-April-10, 22:28

On this issue I've thrown my toys out of the cot more than once whenever partner, as the weaker hand, takes control of the auction. Inevitably we end up one level too high, sometimes two.

So my question is simple: When is the weaker hand allowed to take control of the auction?
1

#2 User is offline   Stephen Tu 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,100
  • Joined: 2003-May-14

Posted 2013-April-10, 23:38

View Post32519, on 2013-April-10, 22:28, said:

On this issue I've thrown my toys out of the cot more than once whenever partner, as the weaker hand, takes control of the auction. Inevitably we end up one level too high, sometimes two.

So my question is simple: When is the weaker hand allowed to take control of the auction?


It's after the stronger hand has limited its strength and distribution in some fashion. Most often happens after opener has shown a balanced hand of some point range, the weaker hand in most systems now is in control since it has a better idea of the total combined assets. So after 1nt/2nt openings and rebids. One cedes control if you had it, anytime you make a non-forcing, limited call.

Sometimes neither hand is really in "control", since each is just describing itself to the other.

Maybe you should post some auctions to see where they went wrong. In the situation you describe, I think most often the problem is after strong 2c auctions, typically the weaker hand should just show/deny fit and make control showing bids, wresting captaincy via some sort of ace-asking call often screws things up since tricks can't be counted accurately. But maybe you have something else in mind, which may or may not actually be an issue of wrongly taking captaincy. Maybe it is just poor hand evaluation, or poor choice of calls.
0

#3 User is offline   Zelandakh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,705
  • Joined: 2006-May-18
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 2013-April-11, 01:54

In my view, if one hand is known and the other unknown, it is right for the unknown hand to take control regardless of strength unless the unknown hand can conveniently pass control back while indicating the range, typically slam interest. I assume this goes back to your dislike of natural 2NT openings? That partner gets you too high in such situations is a matter of hand evaluation, not of it being a problem for the weak hand to start slam investigations.
(-: Zel :-)
0

#4 User is offline   Trinidad 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,531
  • Joined: 2005-October-09
  • Location:Netherlands

Posted 2013-April-11, 02:18

More than half of the time the weaker hand will be in control of the auction.

It is easy to reason that out. In an uncontested auction the description of the hands starts with opener. Responder will know more about opener's hand than opener knows about responder's hand. That is why beginner books already tell that responder is the captain. This captain will -on balance- be weaker than opener. After all, opener has shown above average honor strength, making the captain most of the time the weaker hand.

Rik
I want my opponents to leave my table with a smile on their face and without matchpoints on their score card - in that order.
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the new discoveries, is not “Eureka!” (I found it!), but “That’s funny…” – Isaac Asimov
The only reason God did not put "Thou shalt mind thine own business" in the Ten Commandments was that He thought that it was too obvious to need stating. - Kenberg
0

#5 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2013-April-11, 05:29

View Post32519, on 2013-April-10, 22:28, said:

When is the weaker hand allowed to take control of the auction?

Whenever he judges that it's the right thing to do.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#6 User is offline   fromageGB 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,679
  • Joined: 2008-April-06

Posted 2013-April-11, 05:48

All of the above points to the same thing: one hand has described itself, so that partner knows its distribution and strength. Partner takes control. Sometimes you have a situation when both sides show extras and then one hand is in a situation to invite the other to continue, but this is not common. You should not get to a situation where both hands are undescribed, so that there is a fight over control.
0

#7 User is offline   broze 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,006
  • Joined: 2011-March-08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:UK

Posted 2013-April-11, 06:27

Saw the title of this topic and immediately knew exactly who the OP would be. I'm officially initiated.
'In an infinite universe, the one thing sentient life cannot afford to have is a sense of proportion.' - Douglas Adams
1

#8 User is offline   aguahombre 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,029
  • Joined: 2009-February-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St. George, UT

Posted 2013-April-11, 10:08

Any time he passes.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
0

#9 User is offline   ArtK78 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,786
  • Joined: 2004-September-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Galloway NJ USA
  • Interests:Bridge, Poker, participatory and spectator sports.
    Occupation - Tax Attorney in Atlantic City, NJ.

Posted 2013-April-11, 15:10

Once a fit is found, it is usually the more distributional hand that can figure out exactly what cards are needed to make game or slam. When the distributional hand is the "weaker" hand, the weaker hand should take control.


0

#10 User is offline   Trinidad 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,531
  • Joined: 2005-October-09
  • Location:Netherlands

Posted 2013-April-11, 15:36

View PostArtK78, on 2013-April-11, 15:10, said:

Once a fit is found, it is usually the more distributional hand that can figure out exactly what cards are needed to make game or slam. When the distributional hand is the "weaker" hand, the weaker hand should take control.

IMO, it's the exact opposite. The distributional hand shows the distribution and the more balanced partner evaluates whether the honors fit well. The reason: It's much easier to show distribution than honor location, and often you have already shown part of the distribution in the early part of the auction - before the fit was found.

Even if the fit is found immediately, the priority is to show the fit and the distribution: splinters for shortness, Jacoby 2NT for relatively balanced hands and 2/1 + supporting to emphasize length.

Rik
I want my opponents to leave my table with a smile on their face and without matchpoints on their score card - in that order.
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the new discoveries, is not “Eureka!” (I found it!), but “That’s funny…” – Isaac Asimov
The only reason God did not put "Thou shalt mind thine own business" in the Ten Commandments was that He thought that it was too obvious to need stating. - Kenberg
1

#11 User is offline   MrAce 

  • VIP Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,971
  • Joined: 2009-November-14
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Houston, TX

Posted 2013-April-11, 16:38

View Post32519, on 2013-April-10, 22:28, said:

On this issue I've thrown my toys out of the cot more than once whenever partner, as the weaker hand, takes control of the auction. Inevitably we end up one level too high, sometimes two.

So my question is simple: When is the weaker hand allowed to take control of the auction?


It is hard to draw a line or list situations where weaker hand should take control.

Assuming that you are talking about HCP strength to determine the weak and the strong hand, first thing comes to my mind is, when the stronger hand makes a limit bid, it is often the weaker hand that takes control.

1--1
3 -- (1h bidder may have weaker hand but will definetely take control)

1--1
2NT


1--1
2-3 red suit
3NT--4 something (in this auction who takes control may very but it is not unusual for weaker hand to take control after 3NT and move forward)

1NT--2
3--

1--1
3--4 (if played as forcing and asking pd to cue, ready to take control, depending on what opener cues may stop in game , may bid slam, may ask keycards, may continie cueing, may work for grandslam )
"Genius has its own limitations, however stupidity has no such boundaries!"
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"

"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."





0

#12 User is offline   jogs 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,316
  • Joined: 2011-March-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:student of the game

Posted 2013-April-11, 17:09

View PostTrinidad, on 2013-April-11, 15:36, said:

IMO, it's the exact opposite. The distributional hand shows the distribution and the more balanced partner evaluates whether the honors fit well. The reason: It's much easier to show distribution than honor location, and often you have already shown part of the distribution in the early part of the auction - before the fit was found.


Rik


I don't believe that's true. Look at this auction.

1 - p - 2 - p
p - 2

Neither partner has had an opportunity to show shortness.

Who should decide whether to double or compete with 3?
0

#13 User is offline   aguahombre 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,029
  • Joined: 2009-February-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St. George, UT

Posted 2013-April-11, 17:27

View Postjogs, on 2013-April-11, 17:09, said:

1 - p - 2 - p
p - 2

Neither partner has had an opportunity to show shortness.

Who should decide whether to double or compete with 3?

IMO, only responder. But, in my world he hasn't shown 4 hearts necessarily, and opener has denied six of them. Others would allow opener to bid again with (say) a weak 1-5-(52) hand, but we have found that less than successful. Think about the hands the guy might have to pass 1H and then balance 2S.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
0

#14 User is offline   MrAce 

  • VIP Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,971
  • Joined: 2009-November-14
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Houston, TX

Posted 2013-April-12, 01:49

View Postaguahombre, on 2013-April-11, 17:27, said:

IMO, only responder. But, in my world he hasn't shown 4 hearts necessarily, and opener has denied six of them. Others would allow opener to bid again with (say) a weak 1-5-(52) hand, but we have found that less than successful. Think about the hands the guy might have to pass 1H and then balance 2S.


When did opener deny 6 hearts in this example ? Shall we bid 3 with 6 just because we have 9 card fit, regardless of what we hold in spade suit ?
"Genius has its own limitations, however stupidity has no such boundaries!"
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"

"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."





0

#15 User is offline   Zelandakh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,705
  • Joined: 2006-May-18
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 2013-April-12, 03:13

View Postjogs, on 2013-April-11, 17:09, said:

Who should decide whether to double or compete with 3?

The one with extra offence/defence...but what has this to do with taking control?
(-: Zel :-)
0

#16 User is offline   aguahombre 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,029
  • Joined: 2009-February-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St. George, UT

Posted 2013-April-12, 07:53

View PostMrAce, on 2013-April-12, 01:49, said:

When did opener deny 6 hearts in this example ? Shall we bid 3 with 6 just because we have 9 card fit, regardless of what we hold in spade suit ?

1H-2H
?.....If the question were "Do you...", rather than "Shall we..." --the answer would be yes.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
0

#17 User is offline   jogs 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,316
  • Joined: 2011-March-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:student of the game

Posted 2013-April-12, 09:15

View PostZelandakh, on 2013-April-12, 03:13, said:

The one with extra offence/defence...but what has this to do with taking control?


It's all semantics. Isn't the one making the final
decision taking control?
Agree with 'the one with extra offence/defence'.
Now we need to discuss what constitutes extra
offense/defense.
3/2 decisions. Think we should err on the side
of bidding. 5431 for opener is enough for ODR.
For responder a side suit doubleton may be enough.
0

#18 User is offline   aguahombre 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,029
  • Joined: 2009-February-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St. George, UT

Posted 2013-April-12, 09:29

View Postjogs, on 2013-April-12, 09:15, said:

It's all semantics. Isn't the one making the final
decision taking control?
Agree with 'the one with extra offence/defence'.
Now we need to discuss what constitutes extra
offense/defense.
3/2 decisions. Think we should err on the side
of bidding. 5431 for opener is enough for ODR.
For responder a side suit doubleton may be enough.

Good points. I just have this thing about Opener doing whatever earlier and not having any options at all in this scenario. Responder otherwise has to consider whether to double 2S just to shut opener up, when he is content to let them play but short of real penalty.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
0

#19 User is offline   barmar 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 21,600
  • Joined: 2004-August-21
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2013-April-12, 09:37

View Postaguahombre, on 2013-April-12, 07:53, said:

1H-2H
?.....If the question were "Do you...", rather than "Shall we..." --the answer would be yes.

That's a matter of partnership agreement. If you play 1-2-3-stop, opener normally bids 3 whenever he has an extra trump. But if you play that this is invitational, you can't.

This thread is looking for general guidelines, obviously there will be variations depending on particular partnership needs.

#20 User is offline   aguahombre 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,029
  • Joined: 2009-February-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St. George, UT

Posted 2013-April-12, 10:17

View Postbarmar, on 2013-April-12, 09:37, said:

That's a matter of partnership agreement. If you play 1-2-3-stop, opener normally bids 3 whenever he has an extra trump. But if you play that this is invitational, you can't.

This thread is looking for general guidelines, obviously there will be variations depending on particular partnership needs.

Yep. Hence my careful answer of Mr. Ace' question.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
0

  • 3 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

3 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users