When is the weaker hand allowed to take control of the auction?
#1
Posted 2013-April-10, 22:28
So my question is simple: When is the weaker hand allowed to take control of the auction?
#2
Posted 2013-April-10, 23:38
32519, on 2013-April-10, 22:28, said:
So my question is simple: When is the weaker hand allowed to take control of the auction?
It's after the stronger hand has limited its strength and distribution in some fashion. Most often happens after opener has shown a balanced hand of some point range, the weaker hand in most systems now is in control since it has a better idea of the total combined assets. So after 1nt/2nt openings and rebids. One cedes control if you had it, anytime you make a non-forcing, limited call.
Sometimes neither hand is really in "control", since each is just describing itself to the other.
Maybe you should post some auctions to see where they went wrong. In the situation you describe, I think most often the problem is after strong 2c auctions, typically the weaker hand should just show/deny fit and make control showing bids, wresting captaincy via some sort of ace-asking call often screws things up since tricks can't be counted accurately. But maybe you have something else in mind, which may or may not actually be an issue of wrongly taking captaincy. Maybe it is just poor hand evaluation, or poor choice of calls.
#3
Posted 2013-April-11, 01:54
#4
Posted 2013-April-11, 02:18
It is easy to reason that out. In an uncontested auction the description of the hands starts with opener. Responder will know more about opener's hand than opener knows about responder's hand. That is why beginner books already tell that responder is the captain. This captain will -on balance- be weaker than opener. After all, opener has shown above average honor strength, making the captain most of the time the weaker hand.
Rik
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the new discoveries, is not Eureka! (I found it!), but Thats funny Isaac Asimov
The only reason God did not put "Thou shalt mind thine own business" in the Ten Commandments was that He thought that it was too obvious to need stating. - Kenberg
#5
Posted 2013-April-11, 05:29
32519, on 2013-April-10, 22:28, said:
Whenever he judges that it's the right thing to do.
#6
Posted 2013-April-11, 05:48
#7
Posted 2013-April-11, 06:27
#8
Posted 2013-April-11, 10:08
#9
Posted 2013-April-11, 15:10
#10
Posted 2013-April-11, 15:36
ArtK78, on 2013-April-11, 15:10, said:
IMO, it's the exact opposite. The distributional hand shows the distribution and the more balanced partner evaluates whether the honors fit well. The reason: It's much easier to show distribution than honor location, and often you have already shown part of the distribution in the early part of the auction - before the fit was found.
Even if the fit is found immediately, the priority is to show the fit and the distribution: splinters for shortness, Jacoby 2NT for relatively balanced hands and 2/1 + supporting to emphasize length.
Rik
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the new discoveries, is not Eureka! (I found it!), but Thats funny Isaac Asimov
The only reason God did not put "Thou shalt mind thine own business" in the Ten Commandments was that He thought that it was too obvious to need stating. - Kenberg
#11
Posted 2013-April-11, 16:38
32519, on 2013-April-10, 22:28, said:
So my question is simple: When is the weaker hand allowed to take control of the auction?
It is hard to draw a line or list situations where weaker hand should take control.
Assuming that you are talking about HCP strength to determine the weak and the strong hand, first thing comes to my mind is, when the stronger hand makes a limit bid, it is often the weaker hand that takes control.
1♦--1♥
3♥ -- (1h bidder may have weaker hand but will definetely take control)
1♦--1♥
2NT
1♦--1♠
2♥-3 red suit
3NT--4 something (in this auction who takes control may very but it is not unusual for weaker hand to take control after 3NT and move forward)
1NT--2♥
3♠--
1♣--1♠
3♣--4♣ (if played as forcing and asking pd to cue, ready to take control, depending on what opener cues may stop in game , may bid slam, may ask keycards, may continie cueing, may work for grandslam )
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#12
Posted 2013-April-11, 17:09
Trinidad, on 2013-April-11, 15:36, said:
Rik
I don't believe that's true. Look at this auction.
1♥ - p - 2♥ - p
p - 2♠
Neither partner has had an opportunity to show shortness.
Who should decide whether to double or compete with 3♥?
#13
Posted 2013-April-11, 17:27
jogs, on 2013-April-11, 17:09, said:
p - 2♠
Neither partner has had an opportunity to show shortness.
Who should decide whether to double or compete with 3♥?
IMO, only responder. But, in my world he hasn't shown 4 hearts necessarily, and opener has denied six of them. Others would allow opener to bid again with (say) a weak 1-5-(52) hand, but we have found that less than successful. Think about the hands the guy might have to pass 1H and then balance 2S.
#14
Posted 2013-April-12, 01:49
aguahombre, on 2013-April-11, 17:27, said:
When did opener deny 6 hearts in this example ? Shall we bid 3♥ with 6 just because we have 9 card fit, regardless of what we hold in spade suit ?
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#15
Posted 2013-April-12, 03:13
jogs, on 2013-April-11, 17:09, said:
The one with extra offence/defence...but what has this to do with taking control?
#16
Posted 2013-April-12, 07:53
MrAce, on 2013-April-12, 01:49, said:
1H-2H
?.....If the question were "Do you...", rather than "Shall we..." --the answer would be yes.
#17
Posted 2013-April-12, 09:15
Zelandakh, on 2013-April-12, 03:13, said:
It's all semantics. Isn't the one making the final
decision taking control?
Agree with 'the one with extra offence/defence'.
Now we need to discuss what constitutes extra
offense/defense.
3/2 decisions. Think we should err on the side
of bidding. 5431 for opener is enough for ODR.
For responder a side suit doubleton may be enough.
#18
Posted 2013-April-12, 09:29
jogs, on 2013-April-12, 09:15, said:
decision taking control?
Agree with 'the one with extra offence/defence'.
Now we need to discuss what constitutes extra
offense/defense.
3/2 decisions. Think we should err on the side
of bidding. 5431 for opener is enough for ODR.
For responder a side suit doubleton may be enough.
Good points. I just have this thing about Opener doing whatever earlier and not having any options at all in this scenario. Responder otherwise has to consider whether to double 2S just to shut opener up, when he is content to let them play but short of real penalty.
#19
Posted 2013-April-12, 09:37
aguahombre, on 2013-April-12, 07:53, said:
?.....If the question were "Do you...", rather than "Shall we..." --the answer would be yes.
That's a matter of partnership agreement. If you play 1-2-3-stop, opener normally bids 3 whenever he has an extra trump. But if you play that this is invitational, you can't.
This thread is looking for general guidelines, obviously there will be variations depending on particular partnership needs.
#20
Posted 2013-April-12, 10:17
barmar, on 2013-April-12, 09:37, said:
This thread is looking for general guidelines, obviously there will be variations depending on particular partnership needs.
Yep. Hence my careful answer of Mr. Ace' question.