BBO Discussion Forums: NOT pulling 3nt for a change - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

NOT pulling 3nt for a change

#1 User is offline   Stephen Tu 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,100
  • Joined: 2003-May-14

Posted 2013-April-09, 18:52



So we usually criticize GIB for pulling 3nt without much extra shape. Now we see the rarely seen other side!

- maybe it should bid 4♥ to begin with, how is that currently defined?
- why can't it bid 4♥ on the second round?
- how about the third round?
Generally I think it should be able to pull with 7+ in the suit, and should follow the "8+ suits are trumps" rule.
0

#2 User is offline   georgi 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Yellows
  • Posts: 1,317
  • Joined: 2007-December-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Bulgaria

Posted 2013-May-13, 15:04

It's addressed for improvement for next v27.

1minor - 4Major is currently defined as solid suit 7+ and 13TP exactly.
1minor - 3Major is Splinter.

4♥ over 1♠ after minor opening carries same meaning.
4Major after 1minor opening followed by 1major and 1NT rebid means 6+ cards and 12-16TP. I mean (uncontested) - 1♣ - 1♥ - 1NT - 4♥ etc.
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users