What opening bid?
#1
Posted 2013-February-22, 06:22
♠ A K 10 9
♥ A 8 6
♦ 10 9 8 (Edited!)
♣ A 8 7
Your 1NT = 13-15 HCP
1NT after opening 1♣ = 16-18 HCP.
Do treat this hand as 13-15 or 16-18?
Thx
Jan
#2
Posted 2013-February-22, 06:26
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#4
Posted 2013-February-22, 06:34
George Carlin
#8
Posted 2013-February-22, 10:37
#9
Posted 2013-February-22, 10:55
"Learn from the mistakes of others. You won't live long enough to make them all yourself."
"One advantage of bad bidding is that you get practice at playing atrocious contracts."
-Alfred Sheinwold
#10
Posted 2013-February-22, 12:58
C3: Copious Canape Club is still my favorite system. (Ultra upgraded, PM for notes)
Santa Fe Precision ♣ published 8/19. TOP3 published 11/20. Magic experiment (Science Modernized) with Lenzo. 2020: Jan Eric Larsson's Cottontail ♣. 2020. BFUN (Bridge For the UNbalanced) 2021: Weiss Simplified ♣ (Canape & Relay). 2022: Canary ♣ Modernized, 2023-4: KOK Canape.
#11
Posted 2013-February-22, 13:03
#13
Posted 2013-February-22, 14:09
Hilver, on 2013-February-22, 06:22, said:
I really think that the correct answer to this question is YES!
In any event, I open it a 13-15 1NT if that is what I am playing. I would rather treat this hand as the top of my range than the bottom of the 16-18 range.
By the way, I realize that this hand occurred in the context of a Precision system, but the question being asked really does not fall in the category of "Non-natural Systems."
#14
Posted 2013-February-22, 14:12
- billw55
#15
Posted 2013-February-22, 19:19
But I want partner to declare when he has tenaces.
I choose 1D. Expect 1D-1H-1S-1N or 1D-1N.
#16
Posted 2013-February-25, 03:59
ArtK78, on 2013-February-22, 14:09, said:
Funnily enough, I disagree somewhat with this since original Precision did not advocate too many upgrades or downgrades. In that respect, I would expect the majority of players from that era to have simply opened 1NT. However, I think this hand is definitely worth 16. In other words, it depends on your mentality for upgrading and downgrading. As long as Responder is going to downgrade their quacks properly, then I think upgrading this hand is fine. If not, then I think opening 1NT is also ok. With the more modern style of a lot of upgrading, 1♣ would seem to be clear. But the (original) Precision context makes it likely that this is not the case - that is what might well make it relevant.