Balancing? or not? Balancing of a preemptive bid
#1
Posted 2013-February-07, 09:16
♠6 ♥AJ742 ♦KJ8 ♣9843
The bidding was:
(3♠)-Pass-(Pass)-?
What is your action, if any?
#3
Posted 2013-February-07, 09:52
A direct action over a preempt should be based on sound values. Looking at our hand, it appears that partner may have the values to make a call but no call that makes any sense. For example, suppose partner had xxx KQx ATxx KQx? 4♥ is a reasonable spot, and 3♠ might make.
There is a chance that anything but pass could be a terrible mistake on the hand, but, more often than not, passing will be very bad.
#4
Posted 2013-February-07, 09:56
ArtK78, on 2013-February-07, 09:52, said:
So are you arguing for a 4H balance because you won't get to 4H after a double.
#5
Posted 2013-February-07, 10:02
JLOGIC, on 2013-February-07, 09:56, said:
I am not double-dummying the hand. Double is right as the balance. Whether you will score a bulls-eye by getting to 4♥ after the double is another question.
It is not unreasonable for partner to bid 4♥ on KQx after the balancing double. None of his choices are great.
#6
Posted 2013-February-07, 10:15
ArtK78, on 2013-February-07, 10:02, said:
Heh I know, my only point was that one downside of doubling is you're not necessarily going to get to the right spot even when there is one, namely a lot of 5-3 heart fits. Your example hand imo was an illustration of this.
Of course, I'm a doubler anyways, just playing devils advocate. I expect partner to pass and for them to go down a lot, and if he bids 4H I'm happy. Minor suit bids I might survive... 3N, not so much
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0dd20/0dd207db57e6c9c8de9c9d0b4299e4c8282a573e" alt=":P"
#7
Posted 2013-February-07, 10:16
Get in there with double. May even bounce 4S over our 4H.
#9
Posted 2013-February-07, 13:02
#11
Posted 2013-February-07, 20:51
Trust demands integrity, balance and collaboration.
District 11
Unit 124
Steve Moese
#12
Posted 2013-March-09, 19:40
#14
Posted 2013-March-10, 03:21
#15
Posted 2013-March-10, 06:35
#16
Posted 2013-March-10, 07:48
to let aggressive competing?
I get in double. S-single is the persuader:
the partner with shape competes.