Favourable in first seat, you decide to open a weak 2♦. Both members of the partnership read the texts about how preempts are wider-ranging when favourable and in 1st/3rd seats. That being said, you don't often preempt this lightly. Do you pass?
Rescue partner?
#1
Posted 2013-February-03, 01:07
Favourable in first seat, you decide to open a weak 2♦. Both members of the partnership read the texts about how preempts are wider-ranging when favourable and in 1st/3rd seats. That being said, you don't often preempt this lightly. Do you pass?
#2
Posted 2013-February-03, 02:38
#3
Posted 2013-February-03, 03:31
#4
Posted 2013-February-03, 04:08
#5
Posted 2013-February-03, 06:20
#6
Posted 2013-February-03, 06:59
#7
Posted 2013-February-03, 11:04
If partner gets upset about how aggressively you've preempted, you'll just have to be a little thick skinned about it. And, of course, you can always plead that you thought it was tactically right.
But that will pale in comparison to what might happen if you pull 3 NT and go down when 3 NT makes.
#8
Posted 2013-February-03, 12:09
#9
Posted 2013-February-03, 13:28
George Carlin
#11
Posted 2013-February-03, 18:24
#12
Posted 2013-February-05, 14:38
Antrax, on 2013-February-03, 01:07, said:
Favourable in first seat, you decide to open a weak 2♦. Both members of the partnership read the texts about how preempts are wider-ranging when favourable and in 1st/3rd seats. That being said, you don't often preempt this lightly. Do you pass?
By bidding here, without being doubled, you would be rescuing your opponents, not the pd.
It is very likely that they are being robbed. You should not worry about getting plus score here. And as said above, 4♦ doesn't look any better than 3NT.
And i have seen miracles happen, when opponents make the inferior lead, who knows
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#13
Posted 2013-February-06, 15:56
What is baby oil made of?
#14
Posted 2013-February-06, 20:12
Usually its stated range is 5-11hcp or 6-10hcp in the commen sense.
As to your hand,this weak two bid would be considered a psychic bid by ACBL if not including 3hcp since it misstated the agreed high-card strength ! if including 3hcp,I'd pass.
#15
Posted 2013-February-07, 01:21
(The most emphasis i could figure out how to add )
#16
Posted 2013-February-07, 04:27
#17
Posted 2013-February-07, 08:17
rmnka447, on 2013-February-03, 11:04, said:
If partner gets upset about how aggressively you've preempted, you'll just have to
Fixed.
-gwnn
#18
Posted 2013-February-07, 09:38
lycier, on 2013-February-06, 20:12, said:
Usually its stated range is 5-11hcp or 6-10hcp in the commen sense.
As to your hand,this weak two bid would be considered a psychic bid by ACBL if not including 3hcp since it misstated the agreed high-card strength ! if including 3hcp,I'd pass.
Everyone knows that preempts are all about the hcp strength. Perhaps your ranges are a little 1950s though - can you give us an 11 hcp hand that would choose to open a weak 2 in first seat at favourable? If you are going for a 7 point range then 3-9 seems much more reasonable. Given that the OP speicifcally states that they do not often open quite as light as that though, it would be reasonable to assume that the agreed lower range is more like 4 or 5 in a typical hand.
Note also that wider ranges do require more guesswork, not only for partner but also for the opponents when they hold the missing values. Since this was a first seat preempt the odds are quite good that the opps will have more guesswork ahead of them than we do. Not always, as here, but you hope to come out ahead overall.
Making a bid with slightly less (or more) hcp (sometimes also with a card less than advertised) is typicaly considered a deviation, if I understand the terminology, rather than a psyche. Not that the OP even mentions the ACBL at all so I am not sure how their regulations became involved.
In any case, the question has been answered - best to pass now.
#19
Posted 2013-February-07, 09:57
gwnn, on 2013-February-03, 13:28, said:
I have to admit, if one of my opponents stood up and yelled "DOUBLE!" and then called his broker asking for advice on what to invest with all of his newly found wealth, I might give some thought to pulling.
Otherwise, no.
#20
Posted 2013-February-07, 10:33