Overcalls?
#1
Posted 2013-February-06, 18:09
(1C)=?
No one Vul.
Would you overcall with this type of hand?
If not what would your minimum overcall look like?
#2
Posted 2013-February-06, 18:15
#3
Posted 2013-February-06, 18:18
#6
Posted 2013-February-06, 18:39
mike777, on 2013-February-06, 18:22, said:
Interesting. I wonder how "balancing" will get involved, since this is not a balancing question. Lawrence is not a "wait and do something later" person like Al Roth was.
#7
Posted 2013-February-06, 18:51
aguahombre, on 2013-February-06, 18:39, said:
page 181 "This hand is not worth overcalling on"
The reason I brought this up was a series of these NV type hands where Mike said not to overcall on, later pard will balance.
p.170
both nv
(1C)=?
K87...QJ8....QJ875....97
-------------
There are other examples if you dont like this last one.
#8
Posted 2013-February-06, 19:13
mike777, on 2013-February-06, 18:51, said:
The reason I brought this up was a series of these NV type hands where Mike said not to overcall on, later pard will balance.
p.170
both nv
(1C)=?
K87...QJ8....QJ875....97
-------------
There are other examples if you dont like this last one.
You cannot possibly compare this hand and the original hand. I don't think anyone here would overcall on this. What is the point? The first hand takes away a 1D and 1H response.
#9
Posted 2013-February-06, 19:18
the hog, on 2013-February-06, 19:13, said:
ok but still I thought I do indeed compare the two but here is another one for you, see how you feel about this one?
unfav vul
(1c)=?
Q8765...KQ3...q8...kj4
or
maybe this one is a bit closer to discuss:
no one vul:\
(1D)=?
KQJT7,,,3.....T765....J98
OR
NO ONE VUL
(1h)==?
Q7543...QJ3...AJ...J54
#10
Posted 2013-February-06, 20:06
2) 2S at favourable, else 1S
3) 1S
#11
Posted 2013-February-06, 20:13
I respectfully disagree with Mr. Hog about 2)
#12
Posted 2013-February-06, 21:10
the hog, on 2013-February-06, 19:13, said:
I would overcall 1♦ because it gets us into the auction, partner may be able to raise, or bid a new suit, or make a takeout double, lots of good things can happen.
Now hog, your level of expertise makes you well qualified to give an opinion on what you personally would bid, I am not so sure that it qualifies you to give an opinion on what anyone else would bid!
#13
Posted 2013-February-06, 22:25
655321, on 2013-February-06, 21:10, said:
Now hog, your level of expertise makes you well qualified to give an opinion on what you personally would bid, I am not so sure that it qualifies you to give an opinion on what anyone else would bid!
Welcome back. And, ouch!! You haven't changed the style which endeared you to the elite and aggrevated others.
#14
Posted 2013-February-07, 00:41
aguahombre, on 2013-February-06, 22:25, said:
Hardly "ouch". I ignore posts by the numeric one. When I want his/her sort of response, I flush a toilet.
#15
Posted 2013-February-07, 02:32
mike777, on 2013-February-06, 18:09, said:
(1C)=?
No one Vul.
I think this is quite close. I would definitely overcall at Love All but equally definitely pass at Game All. The other coolours os to some extent a matter of style imho. How much do you want your overcalls to direct a lead/be constructive and how much merely to obstruct?
mike777, on 2013-February-06, 18:51, said:
(1C)=?
K87...QJ8....QJ875....97
A wise person once said that to overcall 1♣ with 1♦ you should either have a good hand or a good suit or both. This hand has neither - if we can make something then partner will act.
mike777, on 2013-February-06, 19:18, said:
(1c)=?
Q8765...KQ3...q8...kj4
I would overcall on this one. The general strength of the hand makes up for the spade suit.
mike777, on 2013-February-06, 19:18, said:
(1D)=?
KQJT7,,,3.....T765....J98
1♠ on this one too, although 2♠ is an option and I would also choose it if partner had passed in front of the Opener.
mike777, on 2013-February-06, 19:18, said:
(1h)==?
Q7543...QJ3...AJ...J54
Yuck, balanced hand, a bad suit, no preemptive value, soft values, QJx in their suit. Everything screams Pass on this hand. Perhaps at MP we should stick our nose in now to give partner the chance to compete to 2♠...perhaps. It is surely anti-percentage to bid at IMPs or any other vulnerability though.
#16
Posted 2013-February-07, 04:50
The hand would make me consider overcalling 2♠ more than 1♠. It is a question of partner's expectation and style, I suppose.
#17
Posted 2013-February-07, 23:17
#18
Posted 2013-February-08, 04:18
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean