BBO Discussion Forums: under-thinking - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

under-thinking

#1 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2013-January-31, 09:41



T1: small club to the 8 from E and K from S.
T2: club back, taken by E, west showing a doubleton.
T3: ♦J by E.

What do you play? MP's.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#2 User is offline   billw55 

  • enigmatic
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,757
  • Joined: 2009-July-31
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2013-January-31, 10:04

I don't quite understand the auction. Presumably 3♣ was looking for 3NT, so why should south have passed instead, and why did north pull from it? Or was 3♣ something else, and if so, what?
Life is long and beautiful, if bad things happen, good things will follow.
-gwnn
0

#3 User is offline   barmar 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 21,603
  • Joined: 2004-August-21
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2013-January-31, 10:08

Maybe "should have passed" refers to the previous round of bidding?

The explanation "*" for the alerted 3♣ is not very helpful.

#4 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2013-January-31, 12:25

I think 3NT should have a 2x stop. 3C is not natural but it shows/denies no more than that. hence the *.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#5 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2013-January-31, 12:45

And 3NT was in tempo.

Anyone up for a play problem??
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
1

#6 User is offline   mgoetze 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,942
  • Joined: 2005-January-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cologne, Germany
  • Interests:Sleeping, Eating

Posted 2013-January-31, 13:12

If East is not being excessively clever then West has the ♦Q, leaving East with all the remaining 12HCP for his 2-level vulnerable overcall on a poor 6-card suit. I'll just play a spade to the ten, heart to the ace, repeat spade finesse, finish drawing trump, and hope for diamonds 3-3 as my best chance at an overtrick.
"One of the painful things about our time is that those who feel certainty are stupid, and those with any imagination and understanding are filled with doubt and indecision"
    -- Bertrand Russell
0

#7 User is offline   jogs 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,316
  • Joined: 2011-March-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:student of the game

Posted 2013-January-31, 14:25

View Postgwnn, on 2013-January-31, 12:45, said:

And 3NT was in tempo.

Anyone up for a play problem??


What does "under-thinking" refer to?

Didn't like East double of 3♣. South could have redoubled.
Then 3NT by North would have two club stoppers if East leads clubs.
0

#8 User is offline   quiddity 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,099
  • Joined: 2008-November-21

Posted 2013-January-31, 15:04

I expected a third club to come back for West to ruff; this switch to ♦J looks like a stiff.

I think I would play a spade to the Q. This wins when East is 2416 (pull East's trumps and play a diamond up). If East is 3316 I can fall back on the heart finesse. I think it's barely possible for East to hold KJx xxx J AJT98x.
0

#9 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2013-January-31, 16:36

View Postjogs, on 2013-January-31, 14:25, said:

What does "under-thinking" refer to?

Didn't like East double of 3♣. South could have redoubled.
Then 3NT by North would have two club stoppers if East leads clubs.

You're quite right, I just forgot about this completely at the table.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#10 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2013-February-01, 08:42

I think it's better to play ♣Q at trick one. After East wins his ace, if he plays back a diamond, we can do something like spade finesse, ♠A, diamond to the 9. Or we might try ♣K, club, hoping that East has ♠8.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

8 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 8 guests, 0 anonymous users