Deal #21 J8 6 KQJ7 AKQJT6
#1
Posted 2013-January-28, 22:01
............................T5432
............................K832
............................853
............................2
A97.......................................................KQ6
A94.......................................................QJT75
A962.....................................................T4
853.......................................................974
............................J8
............................6
............................KQJ7
............................AKQJT6
Outcomes
3C S SCREAM
3C S Moscito
3H E relknes
3H E Precision by Free
3H E Polish Club
3H E Silent Club
3H E qplus10
3H E Zelandakh
3H E New Big Club (HK)
3C S jack502
3H E OCP
3H E TOSR
3H E Unassuming Club
2S N Malfoir
3H E Imprecision
3H E Meckwell Light
3H E Pass2000 (forcing pass opening)
#2
Posted 2013-January-28, 22:02
straube, on 2013-January-28, 22:01, said:
............................T5432
............................K832
............................853
............................2
A97.......................................................KQ6
A94.......................................................QJT75
A962.....................................................T4
853.......................................................974
............................J8
............................6
............................KQJ7
............................AKQJT6
The actual auction went 1C P 1D (1H) 2C (3C) P (3H) 3N P 4C
My guess that 3N showed side diamonds. West was kind not to double.
SCREAM bids this...
1C-1S (16+, DN)
3C-p (to play)
#3
Posted 2013-January-28, 23:41
If partner responds with 1♦, I will bid 2♣ (16-~21, 5+, no 4+ major if 16-17), intending to raise diamonds, or rebid clubs after a major suit response. Slam is no longer in the picture after partner's 1♦.
If partner bids 1M (GF, 9+ points, 5+ suit) I will respond with 2♣ (unbalanced, 5+) intending to bid diamonds later.
If partner bids 1N (9+ points, balanced, GF) I will respond with 3♣ (setting trump and asking partner to make a reverse-cuebid)
If partner bids 2♣ (highly unlikely, as it shows 9+ points, 5+ clubs, unbalanced) I will bid 3♥ (splinter)
If partner bids 2♦ I will also bid 3♥ as a splinter.
If partner bids 2M, showing 5-8 points and 6+ in the major and denying 4+ in the other major, I will respond with 3♣ and continue based on what they show.
If partner makes an "Unusual positive" I will make the key-ask and explore a minor suit slam.
This is obviously a slammish hand, needing 3 working cards to make 6♣
#6
Posted 2013-January-29, 01:52
pass - 1C (0-7 / 17+ ; 0-7 / 17+);
(1H) (assuming they would still bid this)
2C - (3C) - pass - (3H); (2C shows 17+ and is natural)
pass
#7
Posted 2013-January-29, 02:01
2♣-(3♣)-Dbl?-(3♥) (nat NF ; pass would ask for a ♣ lead so I suppose partner doubles)
pass
#9
Posted 2013-January-29, 03:56
Edit after seeing all hands: so I'll end up defending 3♥.
#11
Posted 2013-January-29, 08:48
2♥(3♣) pass (3♥)
(not sure why it chose 2♥ and not 3♣ as in a similar previous hand it was close 0.1 imps in it)
pass 3♠
not sure what 2♥ shd be i'll read the thread and see if anyone mentions it.
#12
Posted 2013-January-29, 09:16
After
1♣ - (P) - 1♦ - 1♥;
2♦ - 3♥,
where 2♦ shows an Acol 2 in a minor (8 tricks or 21+), would North still pass? If so then I guess I have to pass too (partner must be broke) but it stinks and we could still have a huge club fit. Maybe I should switch to the "EBU variant", where an Acol 2 in clubs gets opened with a 2♦ Multi; it is the second one where the 2♦ rebid has caused problems. But I do so prefer the weak only method...
Note: I wrote this before you revealed the hands. It looks like my bid being an Acol 2 rather than non-forcing does not change anything and I just get to defend 3♥(E). I cannot say I like it though.
#13
Posted 2013-January-29, 09:18
#14
Posted 2013-January-29, 09:23
#15
Posted 2013-January-29, 09:26
1♣ - 1♠ (1♠ = double negative)
3♣ (3♣ = clubs
Pass
#16
Posted 2013-January-29, 09:47
Free, on 2013-January-29, 09:23, said:
Sorry if it wasn't enough time. I waited maybe 10 hours after posting the initial problem which I thought would be enough for most people to think about how high they would like to compete. I wanted to give the 0-7 folks the full value of the problem since they can't entirely be sure partner has nothing at their last chance to bid.
#17
Posted 2013-January-29, 09:56
straube, on 2013-January-28, 22:01, said:
North ♠ T5432 ♥ K832 ♦ 853 ♣ 2: __ 1♦ _P
East ..........................: __ 1♥ 3♥
South ♠ J8 ♥ 6 ♦ KQJ7 ♣ AKQJT6: 1♣ 2♣ AP
West ..........................: _P 3♣
- 1♣ = Art, 16+.
- 1♦ = Art, neg, 0-7.
- 2♣ = Nat
3♥ is likely to be the final contract but South might double 3♥. Then North has a close choice between pass and 3♠.
Marks, IMO: 1♠, 1N, 2♣ = 10. (3♥/(3♥X) = 8. 3♣ = 5. 3♠/4♣ = 1.
#18
Posted 2013-January-29, 10:17
1♣ - (P) - 1♦ - (1♥)
2♣ - (2♥) - p - (p)
3♣ - (3♥) - p - (p)
Explanation:
1♣ = 16+, not a balanced 16-20
1♦ = denying several one or two suited hands with 0-7 HCP. With 4 HCP North would have bid 1♥ = 4-4 or 4-5 in the majors and 4-7 HCP.
2♣ = natural, 5+ clubs
3♣ = strong enough to compete at the 3-level
Jan
#19
Posted 2013-January-29, 10:50
Hilver, on 2013-January-29, 10:17, said:
1♣ - (P) - 1♦ - (1♥)
2♣ - (2♥) - p - (p)
3♣ - (3♥) - p - (p)
Explanation:
1♣ = 16+, not a balanced 16-20
1♦ = denying several one or two suited hands with 0-7 HCP. With 4 HCP North would have bid 1♥ = 4-4 or 4-5 in the majors and 4-7 HCP.
2♣ = natural, 5+ clubs
3♣ = strong enough to compete at the 3-level
Jan
I think you're 2H raise is very reasonable, but the opponents on the actual deal cue bid clubs so I'd like to set the problem up that way. 3C P 3H ?
#20
Posted 2013-January-29, 10:58
straube, on 2013-January-29, 09:47, said:
Since these deals are posted on a daily basis, perhaps it would be better to wait 24 hours. Just a suggestion