BBO Discussion Forums: I hate defense - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

I hate defense

#1 User is offline   lalldonn 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,066
  • Joined: 2012-March-06

Posted 2013-January-26, 03:24

I'm on my phone so I can't create a diagram but if someeone else wants to I appreciate it. Knockout match you hold jtxxx aq954 t9x ---. Both vul lho opens 1c, partner passes, rho bids 2d wjs. You double whether you like it or not and lho rebids 3c. Partner doubles ending the auction. Partner leads the 3 of hearts and dummy comes down xx jt76 qjxxxx x. Declarer plays the jack. If you win the ace declarer plays the 8. How do you defend?
"What's the big rebid problem? After 1♦ - 1♠, I can rebid 1NT, 2♠, or 2♦."
- billw55
0

#2 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2013-January-26, 03:56

View Postlalldonn, on 2013-January-26, 03:24, said:

I'm on my phone so I can't create a diagram but if someeone else wants to I appreciate it. Knockout match you hold jtxxx aq954 t9x ---. Both vul lho opens 1c, partner passes, rho bids 2d wjs. You double whether you like it or not and lho rebids 3c. Partner doubles ending the auction. Partner leads the 3 of hearts and dummy comes down xx jt76 qjxxxx x. Declarer plays the jack. If you win the ace declarer plays the 8. How do you defend?





3-J-??; A->8
1

#3 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2013-January-26, 03:59

if partner leads the 2 from 832 I would play Q because partner is surelly 3235, with 4 diamonds he would lead A before singleton.
0

#4 User is offline   the_clown 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 645
  • Joined: 2010-December-02

Posted 2013-January-26, 06:04

I would play a low . This is my only chance to play something through. I expect partner to be endplayed at least once in the defence.
0

#5 User is offline   TWO4BRIDGE 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,247
  • Joined: 2010-October-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Texas

Posted 2013-January-26, 09:02

View PostFluffy, on 2013-January-26, 03:59, said:

if partner ( normwally ) leads the 2 from 832, I would play Q because partner is surelly 3235, with 4 diamonds he would lead A before singleton.

Why return the Q ?
Just play a lower one.... This will prevent Declarer from later scoring the 10 , if he started with three ( concealing the 2 ) .
If he plays low too on the return.... partner will ruff .

If Declarer started with K 8 doubleton, he is getting that K anyway.

EDIT: I'm not sure a return is best anyway . I kinda like clown's -shift .
Don Stenmark
TWOferBRIDGE
"imo by far in bridge the least understood concept is how to bid over a jump-shift
( 1M-1NT!-3m-?? )." ....Justin Lall

" Did someone mention relays? " .... Zelandakh

K-Rex to Mikeh : " Sometimes you drive me nuts " .
0

#6 User is offline   Zelandakh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,703
  • Joined: 2006-May-18
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 2013-January-26, 09:44

View PostTWO4BRIDGE, on 2013-January-26, 09:02, said:

Why return the Q ?

I think Fluffy meant that he would play the Queen on the first trick rather than the Ace. I just know that in real life I would take the Ace and return the J without thinking at all. Since that is the normal Intermediate play (and this is a forum hand in the Expert Forum), Fluffy's line is probably correct.
(-: Zel :-)
0

#7 User is offline   wank 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,866
  • Joined: 2008-July-13

Posted 2013-January-26, 10:04

i'd win ace and return a low diamond - give diamond count and partner can play a trump if his holding is leadable, before declarer scores a spade ruff in dummy. if declarer has akx(x) of spades this has to be done immediately.
1

#8 User is offline   aguahombre 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,029
  • Joined: 2009-February-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St. George, UT

Posted 2013-January-26, 10:40

View PostZelandakh, on 2013-January-26, 09:44, said:

I think Fluffy meant that he would play the Queen on the first trick rather than the Ace. I just know that in real life I would take the Ace and return the J without thinking at all. Since that is the normal Intermediate play (and this is a forum hand in the Expert Forum), Fluffy's line is probably correct.

View Postwank, on 2013-January-26, 10:04, said:

i'd win ace and return a low diamond - give diamond count and partner can play a trump if his holding is leadable, before declarer scores a spade ruff in dummy. if declarer has akx(x) of spades this has to be done immediately.

IMO, Fluffy's line is expert; but, Wank's is experter.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
0

#9 User is online   mikeh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,038
  • Joined: 2005-June-15
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada
  • Interests:Bridge, golf, wine (red), cooking, reading eclectically but insatiably, travelling, making bad posts.

Posted 2013-January-26, 10:41

I understand why one would hate defence, on this hand. I don't see any clearly 'right' answer. I assume competent opps, because it's a KO in which josh is playing, so the 8 from declarer is a mandatory card from K82 or K8. There no inference here. Leading a heart back may still be right even if declarer has the K82: maybe the low ruff is what partner needs.

But, and this seems to me to be a big 'but', partner is going to be endplayed most of the time should he hold a stiff heart, and meanwhile we allow declarer to make our partner ruff a card that may be a loser on other defences.

A diamond back may be needed if partner has Kx, but he'll probably score that eventually anyway.

I'm not going to lead the diamond in the hope that it allows partner to kill a spade ruff: it isn't impossible that that is necessary, but partner will often be losing a trump trick even if he works out that it is best defence.

So by elimination, I lead a spade, but which one?

I think low. If partner has the 9, we are usually going to be ok. If declarer has the 9, along with HH, then we hope that he gets it wrong, and there aren't a lot of such holdings where the J works anyway. Maybe he has AQ9 and decides his best play is the Q, intending to then play A and a ruff.
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari
0

#10 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2013-January-26, 10:59

View Postwank, on 2013-January-26, 10:04, said:

i'd win ace and return a low diamond - give diamond count and partner can play a trump if his holding is leadable, before declarer scores a spade ruff in dummy. if declarer has akx(x) of spades this has to be done immediately.

You are imagining a hand where declarer has 4 spades, I have a lot of trouble imagining a 3 bid with 6-1 minors. 3 spades is certainly possible though.



I now think Q is probably too risky, partner could be singleton and that would really suck, I can picture declarer pitching hearts on diamonds after endplaying partner two or 3 times. the risk/reward is far from even for the Q play.
0

#11 User is offline   MrAce 

  • VIP Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,971
  • Joined: 2009-November-14
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Houston, TX

Posted 2013-January-26, 11:46

I would play the Q on J

It is too early to commit and put my all eggs in one basket at trick one, even if pd has a stiff i may be able to score 2 hearts later. This also keeps communication open in defense. It seems to me the most flexible and recoverable move at this point.
"Genius has its own limitations, however stupidity has no such boundaries!"
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"

"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."





0

#12 User is offline   aguahombre 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,029
  • Joined: 2009-February-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St. George, UT

Posted 2013-January-26, 13:00

Does an expert sometimes choose a normal intermediate play which works, in theory or in a forum? "In practice" doesn't count :rolleyes:
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
0

#13 User is online   mikeh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,038
  • Joined: 2005-June-15
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada
  • Interests:Bridge, golf, wine (red), cooking, reading eclectically but insatiably, travelling, making bad posts.

Posted 2013-January-28, 12:23

So what was the actual layout?
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari
0

#14 User is offline   aguahombre 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,029
  • Joined: 2009-February-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St. George, UT

Posted 2013-January-28, 12:46

View Postaguahombre, on 2013-January-26, 13:00, said:

Does an expert sometimes choose a normal intermediate play which works, in theory or in a forum? "In practice" doesn't count :rolleyes:

View Postmikeh, on 2013-January-28, 12:23, said:

So what was the actual layout?

:D
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
0

#15 User is offline   lamford 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,446
  • Joined: 2007-October-15

Posted 2013-January-28, 16:19

It is quite possible West is void in diamonds, in which case we can probably give partner a heart ruff, and he may be able to exit with a trump safely, stopping the spade ruff in dummy. Give partner Qxx x AKxx KJxxx and the heart ruff is the only defence. West would have a normal pull to 3C with 3-3-0-7, and partner has his penalty double. Note that partner has done well to avoid leading a top diamond, fatally.
I prefer to give the lawmakers credit for stating things for a reason - barmar
0

#16 User is offline   lalldonn 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,066
  • Joined: 2012-March-06

Posted 2013-January-31, 19:13

View Postmikeh, on 2013-January-28, 12:23, said:

So what was the actual layout?

You wouldn't believe me if I told you
"What's the big rebid problem? After 1♦ - 1♠, I can rebid 1NT, 2♠, or 2♦."
- billw55
0

#17 User is offline   PhilKing 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,240
  • Joined: 2012-June-25

Posted 2013-January-31, 19:24

View Postlalldonn, on 2013-January-31, 19:13, said:

You wouldn't believe me if I told you


Make up a hand we will believe, then.
0

#18 User is offline   lalldonn 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,066
  • Joined: 2012-March-06

Posted 2013-January-31, 19:28

Declarer mustered all his courage to rebid 3 with Kx Kx K AKQxxxxx
"What's the big rebid problem? After 1♦ - 1♠, I can rebid 1NT, 2♠, or 2♦."
- billw55
0

#19 User is offline   PhilKing 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,240
  • Joined: 2012-June-25

Posted 2013-January-31, 19:45

View Postlalldonn, on 2013-January-31, 19:28, said:

Declarer mustered all his courage to rebid 3 with Kx Kx K AKQxxxxx


Is it too late to bid 4?
0

#20 User is offline   lalldonn 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,066
  • Joined: 2012-March-06

Posted 2013-January-31, 19:49

It was almost a week ago, so I suspect it's too late...
"What's the big rebid problem? After 1♦ - 1♠, I can rebid 1NT, 2♠, or 2♦."
- billw55
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users