Modern bidding in the sandwhich seat ? vs light opening and responses
#1
Posted 2004-December-11, 07:06
I'd like to know from the experts what strategy they adopt in the sandwhich seat after 1 over 1 auctions by opps.
Textbook strategy is to be extremely cautious:
- avoid "natural" 1NT overcall
- bid only with distributional hands
- avoid bidding with flat hands (or hands with honor concentration in opps suits), even if the hand is strong in hcp.
The rationale behind this is that one opp has opened and the other has responded, so it is likely that pard is broke if we have a good hand but poor shape.
This strategy holds quite well assuming that opps open with sound openings (say 13 hcp or a good 12) and respond 1/1 guaranteeing 5/6+ hcp.
But nowadays, many pairs open routinely, event 1st/2nd seat, with as low as 9-10 point count (with decent shape).
And, many pairs respond 1M over pards' 1m opening, even with JTxxx and nothing else.
This fact seems to suggest that sandwhich bidding tactics should be revised, when playing against very light bidders.
What is your strategy in those cases ?
e.g.
1) you KNOW your opps open and respond light
2) you only suspect opps might be opening and responding light (even more dangerous)
#2
Posted 2004-December-11, 08:34
Personally I'm still quite happy to play the sandwich 1NT as a distributional 2-suiter and leave double as a more balanced takeout.
In terms of system modification, we do not change the system based on the opponents although style may vary. This means against a very aggressive pair we are more likely to double on balanced 13 counts.
#3
Posted 2004-December-11, 09:12
Chamaco, on Dec 11 2004, 04:06 PM, said:
I'd like to know from the experts what strategy they adopt in the sandwhich seat after 1 over 1 auctions by opps.
Textbook strategy is to be extremely cautious:
- avoid "natural" 1NT overcall
- bid only with distributional hands
- avoid bidding with flat hands (or hands with honor concentration in opps suits), even if the hand is strong in hcp.
The rationale behind this is that one opp has opened and the other has responded, so it is likely that pard is broke if we have a good hand but poor shape.
This strategy holds quite well assuming that opps open with sound openings (say 13 hcp or a good 12) and respond 1/1 guaranteeing 5/6+ hcp.
But nowadays, many pairs open routinely, event 1st/2nd seat, with as low as 9-10 point count (with decent shape).
And, many pairs respond 1M over pards' 1m opening, even with JTxxx and nothing else.
This fact seems to suggest that sandwhich bidding tactics should be revised, when playing against very light bidders.
What is your strategy in those cases ?
e.g.
1) you KNOW your opps open and respond light
2) you only suspect opps might be opening and responding light (even more dangerous)
I've seen a fair amount of discussion on this topic. As I recall, Larry Cohen was the first player I saw suggesting this, however, I have not idea whether he originated the concept.
There is probably some truth to the idea, however, I am still using 1NT as Sandwich...
#4
Posted 2004-December-11, 09:29
#5
Posted 2004-December-11, 10:08
#6
Posted 2004-December-11, 10:32
In terms of methods, after (1D)-P-(1S) for example:
X=4-4+ hearts and clubs, good defense
1N=4 hearts, 5+ clubs, good defense
2C= natural
2D=5-5+ hearts and clubs, poor defense
2H=natural
2S=natural
2N=4 hearts, usually 6+ clubs, poor defense.
This separates the shapely hands according to defensive strength and also separtes the two suiters from the long minor/4 card major hands. There are two reason for using 2D rather than 2S for the two-suiter with poor defense:
1. It's cheaper.
2. If there is a stack in the enemy suit youbid naturally, with responders suit it is in front of you, with opener's suit it is behind you.
#7
Posted 2004-December-11, 11:05
the reason for x to show spades in that example is two-fold.. to expose a psych and to suggest a place to play.. i know it's 'standard' to play 2s there as natural, but i think it's unnecessarily high
#8
Posted 2004-December-11, 12:29
♠ Ax ♥ AQJx ♦ Kx ♣ KQxx
♠ xx ♥ QJ9x ♦ AKTx ♣ AJT
♠ Ax ♥ Ax ♦ xx ♣KQJTxx
Hand 1 is strong enough. Hand 2 and 3 become very good if partner has 5 HCP.
#9
Posted 2004-December-11, 12:41
Quote
♠ Ax ♥ AQJx ♦ Kx ♣ KQxx
♠ xx ♥ QJ9x ♦ AKTx ♣ AJT
♠ Ax ♥ Ax ♦ xx ♣KQJTxx
playing the way i play, hand 1 is close to a 1nt overcall, hand 2 is a pass, hand 3 is a 2c bid... 1s is forcing, wait for opener to rebid .... imo only hand 3 is good (shapely) enough for an immediate overcall
#10
Posted 2004-December-11, 13:49
1N is sandwich; usually 5-4 in the unbids.
2N is 5-5 in the unbids; depending on vulnerability.
Dbl tends to show points and does not guarantee 4-4 in the unbids. Its frequently a strong NT overcall or it may show 4 of an unbid suit and 4 of opener's minor for instance.
#11 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2004-December-11, 21:16
#12
Posted 2004-December-12, 09:11