[frank0]

---

The explanation of 6NT is "20-24pts, strong rebidable C" but I doubt it's just a hand that does not fit into any reasonable bid so robot decide to use simulation technique to decide the final contract.

2♥ does not promise 6 in this system.

Anyway, based on the information you have, do you think bid 7♥ or even 7N is +EV?

[gszes]

next time consider immediately bidding 4h over 2c. In this case anything you do
is a complete guess and your p has shown no interest in exploring your heart suit.
Your shortness in clubs is also a reason for caution. PASS

[steve2005]

6N is incredibly bad. robot's playing 2/1 what's the rush, surely 2N or 3♣ would have been better. cant think of a 20-24 pt hand where 7♥ or 7N isn't a possibility and 6♣ or 6♥ might even be safer on a lot of hands.
My guess would be 1 or 2 ♥(not K) and semi-solid ♣

that said i wouldn't bid 7, as surely partner cant have K♥ to make a pre-emptive bid like this.

[pigpenz]

steve2005, on 2012-December-29, 11:37, said:

6N is incredibly bad. robot's playing 2/1 what's the rush, surely 2N or 3♣ would have been better. cant think of a 20-24 pt hand where 7♥ or 7N isn't a possibility and 6♣ or 6♥ might even be safer on a lot of hands.
My guess would be 1 or 2 ♥(not K) and semi-solid ♣

that said i wouldn't bid 7, as surely partner cant have K♥ to make a pre-emptive bid like this.

post in the GIB forum
youll probably get a few more responses from those who play with the robots all the time