Posted 2012-December-20, 06:55
The only question occurs if you are playing some type of game tries where bidding 3 ♠ by opener now is preemptive. It's then a tactical judgement whether you want to try and shut them out with 3 ♠.
Even so, with the minor suit hand behind you, the hand that was opened has lost value, so I feel pass is right.
It seems with 4 ♠s, responder would be more likely to bid 3 ♠ (preempt) or make an invitation with a good 9+. So, responder is more likely to have 3 ♠ and 6-9.
You've done what you could on this hand. They've got to make a decision whether to compete at the 3 level. If they make the right decision, fine they deserve the result. But sometimes it's right to give the opponents a chance to go wrong.