3♥ is mixed raise in support of ♠.
Reisinger SF - compete or done ?
#1
Posted 2012-December-08, 07:45
3♥ is mixed raise in support of ♠.
#2
Posted 2012-December-08, 09:18
#3
Posted 2012-December-08, 09:28
#4
Posted 2012-December-08, 13:00
aguahombre, on 2012-December-08, 09:28, said:
If bidding 4♣ is wrong you will almost surely hear from your opponents. Going for -300 on part score hands doesn't win you a board too often.
#5
Posted 2012-December-08, 17:16
Nor am I worried about them bidding game. I'm not sure what about me bidding now would make them think they were making if they didn't think so a round earlier.
- billw55
#6
Posted 2012-December-08, 17:23
lalldonn, on 2012-December-08, 17:16, said:
Three of the most likely shapes are 3-4-3-3, 3-5-3-2, and 3-5-2-3
#7
Posted 2012-December-09, 05:51
#8
Posted 2012-December-09, 09:44
glen, on 2012-December-08, 17:23, said:
This is kind of like if I said that I go to work most days in a week, and you replied that can't be right because Saturday and Sunday are two of the most commonly occuring days.
- billw55
#9
Posted 2012-December-09, 09:53
lalldonn, on 2012-December-09, 09:44, said:
Except I didn't say "that can't be right", but instead was helping define your usually, such as you said that you usually go to work, and I said what about the weekend
#10
Posted 2012-December-09, 10:01

- billw55
#11
Posted 2012-December-09, 10:19
lalldonn, on 2012-December-09, 10:01, said:

You're welcome. Sometimes it helps to put things in perspective, as whether "usually" is 60%, 80%, or even 100%. This can help calculate the math in how often bidding 4♣ would be LOTT stupid.

#12
Posted 2012-December-09, 10:52
an unbalanced offensively oriented hand (avoiding a possible 3n). I am
not going to let the opps steal away with an easy 3s contract when all it takes
is maybe xxxx Qxxx x KJxx to give us an easy 4c and a tad more
xxxx Axxx x Axxx and we may be looking at 5 (though it is probably too late
to get to 5c unless opps push and p "sacs").
#13
Posted 2012-December-09, 17:43
http://bridge.thomasoandrews.com/deal/
(Thanks gnasher for pointing this to me)
The Specs: West has the hand he's dealt. North has 5♠, South 4 or 5. East has 4 or 5♥. North-South have between themselves 19, 20 or 21 HCP, with South having between 5 and 8 HCP. North, East and South all have balanced or semi-balanced hands. I generated 100 hands and started looking at them. I stopped looking after about 20 of them. You didn't need to be a Nate Silver to know that 4♣ was an overwhelming favorite to make or go at most down 1. Even when you catch East with the dreaded 3433 and opponents keep tapping you, you have a play for down 1. And N-S are making 3♠ just about all the time.
At the table, I didn't give this too much thought before passing. N-S made 3♠ by playing my hand for ♥K. (this is deal no. 28 in Reisinger SF 1, hand records on-line). There was only one other table where they were allowed to play 3♠ and it wasn't at the OT (:
Instructive deal.
#14
Posted 2012-December-10, 00:21