K9xx
xx
Axx
AK8x
opp
Q7xx
Qx
J7xx
Txx
The spots are correct (for the sake of this thread). Your LHO opened 2H and it went (???)
2H-x-p-2S
p-3H-p-3NT
all pass
small heart to the J and Q, what do you play next? Matchpoints. Your partner is already on his way to buy you a drink to apologise.
Page 1 of 1
sometimes you're the windshield
#1
Posted 2012-November-29, 03:02
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
George Carlin
George Carlin
#2
Posted 2012-November-29, 03:55
The field will score -140 when the opponents are in a heart contract. That is the score I want to beat.
Unless, the opponents are still confused about the heart situation, I will lose 5 heart tricks and the ♠A. If I can limit my losers to that, I will have -100 (assuming I am not vul). I will play LHO for ♠Ax and play a spade towards the king. That way, I might get 3 spades, my ♥Q, ♦A and ♣AK. If it works, partner can go back to the bar to buy me another one.
Rik
Unless, the opponents are still confused about the heart situation, I will lose 5 heart tricks and the ♠A. If I can limit my losers to that, I will have -100 (assuming I am not vul). I will play LHO for ♠Ax and play a spade towards the king. That way, I might get 3 spades, my ♥Q, ♦A and ♣AK. If it works, partner can go back to the bar to buy me another one.
Rik
I want my opponents to leave my table with a smile on their face and without matchpoints on their score card - in that order.
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the new discoveries, is not “Eureka!” (I found it!), but “That’s funny…” – Isaac Asimov
The only reason God did not put "Thou shalt mind thine own business" in the Ten Commandments was that He thought that it was too obvious to need stating. - Kenberg
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the new discoveries, is not “Eureka!” (I found it!), but “That’s funny…” – Isaac Asimov
The only reason God did not put "Thou shalt mind thine own business" in the Ten Commandments was that He thought that it was too obvious to need stating. - Kenberg
#3
Posted 2012-November-29, 04:01
Do we know anything about oppo's system? For example, are they playing constructive weak 2s (maybe with weaker ones going via a multi 2♦)? If not, LHO seems unlikely to have ♠A alongside the presumed ♥AK, so perhaps I should cross to dummy with a ♣ and play RHO for ♠Ax instead.
#4
Posted 2012-November-29, 04:02
If LHO had Ax/AKTxxx/xxx/xx, would they open 2♥? I followed the same resoning as Rik but came to the opposite conclusion, crossing to ♣K and playing a spade to hand on the basis that LHO cannot hold the ♠A.
(-: Zel :-)
#5
Posted 2012-November-29, 05:20
Extra info, as requested:
Opps are sound but they only have one weak 2 available. They will not open 2H with Ax AKxxxx xxx xx.
Opps are sound but they only have one weak 2 available. They will not open 2H with Ax AKxxxx xxx xx.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
George Carlin
George Carlin
#6
Posted 2012-December-03, 05:57
If I am vulnerable, lay the hand down and claim 4 tricks, then spend the 5 minutes at the bar.
If I am not vulnerable, do as most seem to, hope RHO has A doubleton spade. Cross to a club, lead to ♠Q then duck a spade.
If I am not vulnerable, do as most seem to, hope RHO has A doubleton spade. Cross to a club, lead to ♠Q then duck a spade.
#7
Posted 2012-December-03, 06:05
I played a heart back, what do you think of that? They did indeed let go of spades but I mangled up my communications and went down 4 anyway
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
George Carlin
George Carlin
Page 1 of 1