The 1nt was 11-15, 2♣ was staymen, the first double was discussed and agreed as penalty. The question is, what is the 2nd double.
Is this double takeout or penality
#1
Posted 2012-November-28, 12:18
The 1nt was 11-15, 2♣ was staymen, the first double was discussed and agreed as penalty. The question is, what is the 2nd double.
#2
Posted 2012-November-28, 12:23
dwar0123, on 2012-November-28, 12:18, said:
The 1nt was 11-15, 2♣ was staymen, the first double was discussed and agreed as penalty. The question is, what is the 2nd double.
The flippant answer to your question "is the double for takeout or penalty" is yes.
Seriously, I think it is for penalty, as fourth hand could have bid or doubled over 2♣ or balanced with 2NT or 3 of a suit.
#3
Posted 2012-November-28, 13:00
Never tell the same lie twice. - Elim Garek on the real moral of "The boy who cried wolf"
#4
Posted 2012-November-28, 14:46
dwar0123, on 2012-November-28, 12:18, said:
It sounds flippant, but the answer is "whatever you agreed it is". My partnerships have the agreement that after we double 1NT that subsequent doubles are penalty (and to a point passes are forcing, although we can pass out 2♠), but others play that subsequent doubles are takeout.
#5
Posted 2012-November-28, 14:58
jeffford76, on 2012-November-28, 14:46, said:
The answer is always "whatever you agreed it is". I wouldn't be asking if we had an agreement
#6
Posted 2012-November-28, 15:29
dwar0123, on 2012-November-28, 14:58, said:
Then you should make one.
You should also agree how high of a force you are in and what the double of 2♣ means.
I've played 1st penalty, 2nd takeout, 3rd penalty, but I've also played 1st penalty, 2ndpenalty.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#7
Posted 2012-November-28, 15:32
dwar0123, on 2012-November-28, 14:58, said:
I understand this, but I think there are certain situations that are so widely played multiple ways that it doesn't really make sense to say "what is standard?" or "what is the default undiscussed?" because I don't think there is one. Lots of low level penalty/takeout questions fall into this bucket including this one.
#8
Posted 2012-November-28, 15:36
dwar0123, on 2012-November-28, 14:58, said:
Do you have an agreement about what East's double of 2C and West's double of 2S would have been? This double should probably mean the same thing as those. If they have different meanings then you have probably thought about this long enough to have a meaning for this double as well.
#10
Posted 2012-November-28, 19:29
Phil, on 2012-November-28, 15:29, said:
Yes, I have partners who prefer each of these. I think that the first option is slightly more common, but I do not know which I would assume without discussion.
#11
Posted 2012-November-28, 20:35
Personally I play takeout in all partnerships where I have discussed it though.
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
#12
Posted 2012-November-28, 20:55
awm, on 2012-November-28, 20:35, said:
Personally I play takeout in all partnerships where I have discussed it though.
Agree on everything in theory and congratulate you that you have been able to win the discussion(s).
#13
Posted 2012-November-28, 21:13
#14
Posted 2012-November-29, 03:51
A different agreement is, all low level double of partial contracts in a suit are for
takeout.
I think the later is more useful, even after a penalty double of an NT, you will be more
often short in their suit, than having (some) length.
Also important is, does the penalty double create a forcing pass and how high, because if
you are in a forcing pass sequence, than double is penalty.
So your forcing pass agreement could mean, that doubles of their runout below a certain
level are penalty, and above are for takeout, i.e. combining both agreements.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#15
Posted 2012-November-29, 04:02
In general I prefer take-out doubles after we doubled 1NT for penalties but this Stayman auction is different, I think.
#16
Posted 2012-November-29, 04:12
Here's a further test question for you - what did your partner's pass of 2♣ mean from your point of view? What would a double instead have meant? The answer to these questions might conceivably impact on the answer to yours.
#17
Posted 2012-November-29, 11:05
Zelandakh, on 2012-November-29, 04:12, said:
Here's a further test question for you - what did your partner's pass of 2♣ mean from your point of view? What would a double instead have meant? The answer to these questions might conceivably impact on the answer to yours.
Doubling 2♣ would have shown clubs, passing denied good ♣. Not discussed specifically other then the meta agreement that doubling artificial bids shows the suit bid.
#18
Posted 2012-November-29, 14:41
P_Marlowe, on 2012-November-29, 03:51, said:
Also important is, does the penalty double create a forcing pass and how high, because if
you are in a forcing pass sequence, than double is penalty.
So your forcing pass agreement could mean, that doubles of their runout below a certain
level are penalty, and above are for takeout, i.e. combining both agreements.
With kind regards
Marlowe
No. If pass is forcing, it is very playable to keep double as take-out, as I do in all my partnerships. There are some theoretical advantages to this, and basically no disadvantages.
If pass is non-forcing, I think it is important to play double as take-out as that is a more common hand-type than a penalty double.
#19
Posted 2012-November-29, 14:42
dwar0123, on 2012-November-29, 11:05, said:
Given that 2C was forcing and artificial, you might find it useful to agree instead that doubling shows values and sets up a forcing pass over opener's rebid, while pass shows a weak hand and means pass is not forcing.
#20
Posted 2012-November-29, 14:51
- hrothgar