This is a spin-off of another post:
1♥-(2♠)-Pass-(Pass)
DBL-(Pass)-2NT!-(Pass)
3♦
Suppose you agreed that 2NT=Lebensohl
What is 3♦?
Can it be a minimum hand with 2551 that wanted to DBL first in case partner had a penalty pass? Or is it always extras?
Page 1 of 1
After Lebensohl
#2
Posted 2012-November-03, 03:37
I can not agree to play this 2 NT as leb
It is the text book scramble bid, telling pd to bid whatever he wants and good luck. Something like Jxxx Qxx xxx xxx, Qxx xxxx Jxxx xx etc etc...
But since we are forced to play this as lebensol, i would think your pd has a superaccept if you have clubs. I mean i would think 3♦ is natural normally when there is no agreement, but it doesn't make sense after take out dbl, although superaccept doesn't make too much sense to me either, so this auction is *****ed up and going nowhere good imo
It is the text book scramble bid, telling pd to bid whatever he wants and good luck. Something like Jxxx Qxx xxx xxx, Qxx xxxx Jxxx xx etc etc...
But since we are forced to play this as lebensol, i would think your pd has a superaccept if you have clubs. I mean i would think 3♦ is natural normally when there is no agreement, but it doesn't make sense after take out dbl, although superaccept doesn't make too much sense to me either, so this auction is *****ed up and going nowhere good imo
"Genius has its own limitations, however stupidity has no such boundaries!"
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#3
Posted 2012-November-03, 03:59
If you aren't playing lebensohl, your two sample hands are obvious 3H bids.
This is not a 'textbook' scramble bid, you can play it as that, there is also real merit in playing it as lebensohl because responder's range is very wide.
To answer the original question, I would say this is a 'contract correction' i.e. more likely to be a 5-5 than a super-accept for clubs. But this would still imply extra values, because the doubler was prepared to defend 2Sx, which a minimum 5-5 generally wouldn't be.
This is not a 'textbook' scramble bid, you can play it as that, there is also real merit in playing it as lebensohl because responder's range is very wide.
To answer the original question, I would say this is a 'contract correction' i.e. more likely to be a 5-5 than a super-accept for clubs. But this would still imply extra values, because the doubler was prepared to defend 2Sx, which a minimum 5-5 generally wouldn't be.
#4
Posted 2012-November-03, 04:18
#5
Posted 2012-November-03, 04:30
FrancesHinden, on 2012-November-03, 03:59, said:
If you aren't playing lebensohl, your two sample hands are obvious 3H bids.
This is not a 'textbook' scramble bid, you can play it as that, there is also real merit in playing it as lebensohl because responder's range is very wide.
To answer the original question, I would say this is a 'contract correction' i.e. more likely to be a 5-5 than a super-accept for clubs. But this would still imply extra values, because the doubler was prepared to defend 2Sx, which a minimum 5-5 generally wouldn't be.
This is not a 'textbook' scramble bid, you can play it as that, there is also real merit in playing it as lebensohl because responder's range is very wide.
To answer the original question, I would say this is a 'contract correction' i.e. more likely to be a 5-5 than a super-accept for clubs. But this would still imply extra values, because the doubler was prepared to defend 2Sx, which a minimum 5-5 generally wouldn't be.
Deleted:
Sorry, i for some reason thought opener opened with 1 NT ( due to lebensol arguments), i wrote a long reply but deleted it after i just saw we opened 1♥
Now i see why u say we have an obvious 3♥ bid, i was like " Doesn't she ever DBL with 2344 2353 2335 ?" Thinking that we opened 1 NT. My example hands makes sense only if opener opened with 1 NT, obviously.
"Genius has its own limitations, however stupidity has no such boundaries!"
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#7
Posted 2012-November-04, 05:07
so 3 writer, three opinions.
I would take it as Timo or as: I forgot that we play leb, I scramble.... Usually it is the second case.
I would take it as Timo or as: I forgot that we play leb, I scramble.... Usually it is the second case.
Kind Regards
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
Page 1 of 1