BBO Discussion Forums: Another individual. - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Another individual. ATB

#1 User is offline   Quartic 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 285
  • Joined: 2010-December-19
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:England
  • Interests:Walking, Climbing, Mathematics, Programming, Linux, Reading, Bridge.

Posted 2012-October-23, 06:10



North thought 5♣ denied defence. South thought North was wrong to bid 6♣, and thought 4♣ was optimistic. Who is right, or are both to blame?
0

#2 User is offline   ArtK78 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,786
  • Joined: 2004-September-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Galloway NJ USA
  • Interests:Bridge, Poker, participatory and spectator sports.
    Occupation - Tax Attorney in Atlantic City, NJ.

Posted 2012-October-23, 06:36

North did plenty when he bid 4♣. The 5♣ bid did not request any further cooperation from North, and North should respect the decision of South in any further action. Not only that, but his Jxxx of hearts and his Qx of diamonds have some defensive value.

The interference got EW up to the 5 level. North has no clue as to the exact makeup of South's hand. He has no reason to bid anymore.

North is 100% to blame.
0

#3 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2012-October-23, 06:40

north bid his hand twice, big error. Defending at this colors over 5x is also a big error with a yaborough, it is ludicrous.


IMO given the vulnerability sotuh also bid his hand twice, but a bit closer.
BridgeGod: my personal website with interactive problems and articles
0

#4 User is offline   wank 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,866
  • Joined: 2008-July-13

Posted 2012-October-23, 06:58

Ketamine for North, STAT.
0

#5 User is offline   Codo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,373
  • Joined: 2003-March-15
  • Location:Hamburg, Germany
  • Interests:games and sports, esp. bridge,chess and (beach-)volleyball

Posted 2012-October-23, 07:11

North was lunatic, south just a little besides the track.
Kind Regards

Roland

Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
0

#6 User is offline   Bbradley62 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,542
  • Joined: 2010-February-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brooklyn, NY, USA

Posted 2012-October-23, 07:17

View PostFluffy, on 2012-October-23, 06:40, said:

north bid his hand twice, big error.
I think North was bidding someone else's hand. South did nothing wrong.
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users