BBO Discussion Forums: Diamonds - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Diamonds Many of them...

#1 User is offline   Hanoi5 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,083
  • Joined: 2006-August-31
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Santiago, Chile
  • Interests:Bridge, Video Games, Languages, Travelling.

Posted 2012-September-27, 13:13

MP's, w/r:
♠QT
♥xxx
♦AQJ97432
♣---

1♣-1♠-2♣-?

What's your overall plan?

 wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:

Also, he rates to not have a heart void when he leads the ♥3.


 rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:

Besides playing for fun, most people also like to play bridge to win


My YouTube Channel
0

#2 User is offline   TWO4BRIDGE 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,247
  • Joined: 2010-October-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Texas

Posted 2012-September-27, 15:32

2D ... New suit by unpassed Advancer = forcing one round for now.
Don Stenmark
TWOferBRIDGE
"imo by far in bridge the least understood concept is how to bid over a jump-shift
( 1M-1NT!-3m-?? )." ....Justin Lall

" Did someone mention relays? " .... Zelandakh

K-Rex to Mikeh : " Sometimes you drive me nuts " .
0

#3 User is offline   Phil 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,092
  • Joined: 2008-December-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:North Texas, USA
  • Interests:Mountain Biking

Posted 2012-September-27, 15:46

I'm not going crazy with this one. Partner has 3-4 hearts, at least 5+ spades, and could have a few clubs.

2♦ reserving my rights.
Hi y'all!

Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
0

#4 User is offline   gszes 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,664
  • Joined: 2011-February-12

Posted 2012-September-27, 16:15

we are 25% from making 7d opposite AJ9xx Axx xx xxx
and yet if p has AKJ9x QJTx xx Ax we are only 50%
to make 5d. We have little defense and there is no rational
method of discovering how good p hand is for slam.

IMO our best bet is to make sure the opps cant steal the
hand for anything less than 6c. If we now bid

5d

P will have the option of x 6c (knowing we promised little/no
defense. Anything other than 5d takes a large position that p
will comprehend the length of our diamonds if we repeat them.

Even if we have a spade fit (62) it is unlikely to do all that well
unless we were heading to making dia also.
0

#5 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2012-September-27, 16:30

I like a simple 2D (NF) on these kinds of hands. Preempting does not help that much anymore (opener knows what responder has more or less and who cares what responder knows) so might as well try to find out something/try to buy the contract as low as possible. Maybe I'm biased from the small sample size but this approach has generally worked out for me.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#6 User is offline   SteveMoe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,168
  • Joined: 2012-May-17
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cincinnati Unit 124
  • Interests:Family, Travel, Bridge Tournaments and Writing. Youth Bridge

Posted 2012-September-27, 22:03

2♦ F1R - not like 5♦ with 3 small ♥s.
Be the partner you want to play with.
Trust demands integrity, balance and collaboration.
District 11
Unit 124
Steve Moese
0

#7 User is offline   Zelandakh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,736
  • Joined: 2006-May-18
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 2012-September-28, 03:16

2♦ seems obvious regardless of how forcing it is. They found their fit and are much better defined than us so 5♦ is just giving us a bigger guess than they will have. We can still belong in any of 4 strains and defending the 5th doubled is also possible if they bid again and partner has the remaining clubs.
(-: Zel :-)
0

#8 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2012-September-28, 03:23

View PostZelandakh, on 2012-September-28, 03:16, said:

2♦ seems obvious regardless of how forcing it is.

Yes, I agree with this more than what I wrote. I strongly believe 2D should be nonforcing here but of course I would also bid it if it were forcing by agreement.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#9 User is offline   Hanoi5 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,083
  • Joined: 2006-August-31
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Santiago, Chile
  • Interests:Bridge, Video Games, Languages, Travelling.

Posted 2012-September-28, 05:22

Say it goes on:

(1♣)-1♠-(2♣)-2♦
(2♥)-2♠-(3♥)-???

 wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:

Also, he rates to not have a heart void when he leads the ♥3.


 rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:

Besides playing for fun, most people also like to play bridge to win


My YouTube Channel
0

#10 User is offline   PhilKing 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,240
  • Joined: 2012-June-25

Posted 2012-September-28, 06:04

View PostHanoi5, on 2012-September-28, 05:22, said:

Say it goes on:

(1♣)-1♠-(2♣)-2♦
(2♥)-2♠-(3♥)-???


Four Clubs.
0

#11 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2012-September-28, 07:33

Seems kind of unrealistic, but I think I would continue ostensibly underbidding and bid 4♦. Next I will try 4♠ over 4♥ I guess.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#12 User is offline   TWO4BRIDGE 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,247
  • Joined: 2010-October-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Texas

Posted 2012-September-28, 07:55

View PostHanoi5, on 2012-September-28, 05:22, said:

Say it goes on:

(1♣)-1♠-(2♣)-2♦
(2♥)-2♠-(3♥)-???


3S ... I'm not going crazy... The Diam suit may only produce 1 trick .
Don Stenmark
TWOferBRIDGE
"imo by far in bridge the least understood concept is how to bid over a jump-shift
( 1M-1NT!-3m-?? )." ....Justin Lall

" Did someone mention relays? " .... Zelandakh

K-Rex to Mikeh : " Sometimes you drive me nuts " .
0

#13 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2012-September-28, 09:16

View PostTWO4BRIDGE, on 2012-September-28, 07:55, said:

3S ... I'm not going crazy... The Diam suit may only produce 1 trick .

in spades yes! what about in diamonds?
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users