A pair have an agreement that after 1x (bid) , a negative double can me made with;
5 hcp if opener is forced to bid at the 1 level,
8 hcp if opener is forced to bid at the 2 level,
11 hcp if opener is forced to bid at the 3 level.
Bridge logic or alertable?
Page 1 of 1
5,8,11 bridge logic or alertable?
#1
Posted 2012-September-27, 19:33
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly." MikeH
#2
Posted 2012-September-27, 19:48
I am nothing remotely resembling a laws expert, but if this negative double structure were alertable, I would be stunned.
#3
Posted 2012-September-27, 21:03
So would I.
--------------------
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
#4
Posted 2012-September-27, 21:51
If the question is "Do we need more strength to commit to higher levels?" I believe that falls under Bridge logic. The understanding you referred to in the OP is about minimum strength for the actions. If the agreement includes a maximum, then we might have disclosure issues.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
#5
Posted 2012-September-28, 00:22
That was easy, thanks.
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly." MikeH
Page 1 of 1