BBO Discussion Forums: Ogusty-Featurey Thingy Dingy - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Ogusty-Featurey Thingy Dingy Is this it?

#1 User is offline   masse24 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 342
  • Joined: 2009-April-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Chicago Suburbs

Posted 2012-August-14, 12:22

(1♦) - 2♠ - (P) - 2NT

What is 2NT? :blink:
“Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.” George Carlin
1

#2 User is offline   nigel_k 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,207
  • Joined: 2009-April-26
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Wellington, NZ

Posted 2012-August-14, 13:08

It's the same as what you play over a weak 2♠ opening. The fact they have opened doesn't change much. You can use 3♦ as specifically a spade invite so that declarer's hand is not revealed any more than necessary, but 2NT as an asking bid is still a lot more useful than natural. If you play multi then you need a specific agreement in this case.
http://bridgethoughts.blogspot.com
0

#3 User is offline   JLOGIC 

  • 2011 Poster of The Year winner
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,002
  • Joined: 2010-July-08
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2012-August-14, 15:01

I think a lot of people switch to shortness ask when it's an overcall or when they are a passed hand (the idea being you are not searching for slam and shortness is usually the most important feature when game trying).

I'm sure playing feature or ogust or whatever you usually play is fine. If you usually play ogust but overcall soundly then maybe you should switch to feature or shortness ask, I feel like ogust is good only if you're undisciplined/wide range.
blogging at http://www.justinlall.com
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users