Help
Do people balance with a 13-14 count if your lefty opened a weak 2?
(More so if they opened 2M than 2D)
Say:
2S - Pass - Pass - ?
S - KJx
H - xxx
D - AJxx
C - KJxx
or something of the sort.
Page 1 of 1
Balancing over Weak 2
#1
- Group: Members
- Posts: 14
- Joined: 2010-December-06
- Gender:Male
- Location:Philadelphia
Posted 2012-June-18, 13:49
#2
- Group: Members
- Posts: 23
- Joined: 2012-April-09
- Gender:Male
- Location:Oregon, USA
Posted 2012-June-18, 13:59
I always balance with 14 cards. I'll be sure to get an extra trick as declarer!
Otherwise, I might, but I'd want a better 13 point count than here, though. KJx trapped by long Spades to your left won't be worth much, the overly flat nature of this hand indicates and our partner passing already don't bode well for us offensively.
Otherwise, I might, but I'd want a better 13 point count than here, though. KJx trapped by long Spades to your left won't be worth much, the overly flat nature of this hand indicates and our partner passing already don't bode well for us offensively.
#3
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 1,168
- Joined: 2012-May-17
- Gender:Male
- Location:Cincinnati Unit 124
- Interests:Family, Travel, Bridge Tournaments and Writing. Youth Bridge
Posted 2012-June-18, 22:10
With only 9 working HCP this hand is worth a quick pass. Since 3-card raises are almost automatic, opponents have a 7-8 card ♠ fit at best. Sure partner might have ♥ length, but I wouldn't be surprised if RHO showed up with 5. Partner's silence paints 11 HCP or fewer and no takeout double or biddable suit. Why are we struggling to play in an 8-card fit somewhere at the 3-level in a 16 trump hand? Even were our side to have 24/5 HCP we might not have tricks from length. I am a bit more secure with this pass at Unfav vulnerability.
Change the hand slightly from
♠KJx
♥xxx
♦AJxx
♣KJxx
to
♠xxx
♥KJxx
♦AJx
♣KJx
and I would consider a balancing double - three places to play with a focus on the other major.
Sometimes their preempts work.
Change the hand slightly from
♠KJx
♥xxx
♦AJxx
♣KJxx
to
♠xxx
♥KJxx
♦AJx
♣KJx
and I would consider a balancing double - three places to play with a focus on the other major.
Sometimes their preempts work.
Be the partner you want to play with.
Trust demands integrity, balance and collaboration.
District 11
Unit 124
Steve Moese
Trust demands integrity, balance and collaboration.
District 11
Unit 124
Steve Moese
#4
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 648
- Joined: 2010-October-27
- Gender:Male
- Location:San Bernardino, CA USA
Posted 2012-June-18, 22:36
I'd pass this one without regrets--ask yourself if you would balance with a hand a king weaker over 1♠. I wouldn't.
#5
- 2011 Poster of The Year winner
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 6,002
- Joined: 2010-July-08
- Gender:Male
#6
- Group: Members
- Posts: 14
- Joined: 2010-December-06
- Gender:Male
- Location:Philadelphia
Posted 2012-June-26, 15:40
In general do people ever bid balancing 2N over a weak 2?
#7
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 879
- Joined: 2009-December-20
- Gender:Male
- Location:Podunk, backwater USA
Posted 2012-June-26, 16:07
No, and I think a balancing 2NT should be used as Unusual 2NT. Since everybody I know will bid 3♠ with 3-card support, and quite a few with only 2, it stands to reason that on the first hand everything sits horribly for us, so why bid on? They could easily have a better fit.
"It's not enough to win the tricks that belong to you. Try also for some that belong to the opponents."
"Learn from the mistakes of others. You won't live long enough to make them all yourself."
"One advantage of bad bidding is that you get practice at playing atrocious contracts."
-Alfred Sheinwold
"Learn from the mistakes of others. You won't live long enough to make them all yourself."
"One advantage of bad bidding is that you get practice at playing atrocious contracts."
-Alfred Sheinwold
#8
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 2,502
- Joined: 2007-December-22
Posted 2012-June-26, 16:59
GHS_K_Chow, on 2012-June-26, 15:40, said:
In general do people ever bid balancing 2N over a weak 2?
Yes.
That's impossible. No one can give more than one hundred percent. By definition that is the most anyone can give.
#9
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 12,029
- Joined: 2009-February-21
- Gender:Male
- Location:St. George, UT
Posted 2012-June-26, 17:59
GHS_K_Chow, on 2012-June-26, 15:40, said:
In general do people ever bid balancing 2N over a weak 2?
Yes, but the 13-count in the OP isn't a 2NT balance over a weak 2. It would be (barely) a NT balance over 1S.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
#10
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 636
- Joined: 2011-December-01
- Gender:Not Telling
- Location:UK
-
Interests:Bridge, Poker, but not in conflation.
Statistics, but not massaged by the media.
Posted 2012-June-26, 19:18
mikestar13, on 2012-June-18, 22:36, said:
I'd pass this one without regrets--ask yourself if you would balance with a hand a king weaker over 1♠. I wouldn't.
Remove ♠K to make it a 13 card hand, and I would non-vul
A perfection of means, and confusion of aims, seems to be our main problem Albert Einstein
Page 1 of 1