fito, on 2012-June-18, 15:33, said:
Club level, not on-line play.
West hesitates not for a long time, could be for 5 seconds, but playing without screens this few second are more than enough. East is a 20 year player, not a good player, but she wins once in a week in her club. West is a 10-12 years same level player. They are not a experts, but nor beginners, and they play together at least once in a week, and play negative doubles.
Do you think than this break in tempo is enough to produce UI? if yes, do you allow 3
♠ bidding? If yes, do you agree with the final pass of West? If you need more information, just ask me. Your comments. Thx.
For me, a 5-6 second pause is "in tempo" bidding in a competitive auction, and any faster a pass by responder transmits UI to opener. I mean, count silently to 5 or 6 while staring at your imaginary hand and then pass -- to me this is in tempo and proper, as you could be completely bust or with a difficult hand, and partner will be none the wiser, obviously so long as you do this when completely bust as well.
I think because you posted this here that this pair would call too quickly when bust, and this 5-6 seconds did transmit some values to opener. If that's the case that values were transmitted via the BIT, then certainly that BIT suggests bidding on or doubling. Opener's hand and the auction show that partner couldn't be waiting for a double, so bidding 3
♠ seems like a logical alternative made more attractive by the UI. A poll is a better way to determine that than one person's opinion.
If I were west, and apparently we weren't playing negative doubles here, I would raise partner's 3
♠ to 4
♠, but that also is pollable. If UI is established as available, I don't think West has any, and can freely choose amongst LAs. Or is the argument that W has UI based on a belief that E has already acted on UI, and may not have his call?