BBO Discussion Forums: They jump over you 1NT - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

They jump over you 1NT What is needed?

#1 User is offline   Hanoi5 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,082
  • Joined: 2006-August-31
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Santiago, Chile
  • Interests:Bridge, Video Games, Languages, Travelling.

Posted 2012-May-14, 21:02

So, your partner opens 1NT and the next player pre-empts naturally at the 3 level. What are you to do?

There's another topic covering the question of whether to use a bid a transfer or texas, but what is the best use for the double? Would 3NT show or deny the stopper? can we 'just' compete at the three (or four?) level?

I use the same structure of the 4-level for this situations, so in theory I won't have a problem if they 'psych' but is this reason enough for that treatment?

 wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:

Also, he rates to not have a heart void when he leads the 3.


 rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:

Besides playing for fun, most people also like to play bridge to win


My YouTube Channel
0

#2 User is offline   Bende 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 149
  • Joined: 2007-January-23
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2012-May-15, 07:14

I play double as takeout and transfers. I think I got this structure from Justin Lall.

1NT - (3) -
dbl = takeout
3 = GI+ with hearts
3 = GI+ with spades
3 = GF with diamonds
3NT = to play
4 = 5-5 majors

1NT - (3) -
dbl = takeout
3 = GI+ with spades
3 = GF with hearts
3NT = to play
4 = NAT forcing
4 = 5-5 majors

1NT - (3) -
dbl = 4+ spades
...3 = three spades
...3NT = two spades
...4m/4 = cue with four spades and good cards for slam
...4 = four spades without good cards for slam
3 = GF without four spades and without stopper
3NT = to play
4m = NAT forcing

1NT - (3) -
dbl = GF takeout
3NT = to play
4m = NAT forcing
4 = to play
1

#3 User is offline   fromageGB 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,679
  • Joined: 2008-April-06

Posted 2012-May-15, 09:30

I agree with the transfers and most of the rest, but when partner (opener) has a hand that has a minimum of 2 of their suit, is fairly balanced, and has considerable limited strength, I think there is a lot of merit in X for penalty. This is a completely different situation from a jump over partner's one of a suit open.

It is also different in that while with a low doubleton opener may reopen with a X after a 2 level overcall, he will not be doing that with a 3 level overcall.
0

#4 User is offline   fromageGB 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,679
  • Joined: 2008-April-06

Posted 2012-May-15, 09:36

View PostHanoi5, on 2012-May-14, 21:02, said:

Would 3NT show or deny the stopper? can we 'just' compete at the three (or four?) level?


I don't think denying a stopper is much use. Is partner supposed to take out to 4 of a minor on no fit when he does not have solid stops? So for me 3NT and X are bid with similar hands, but depending on vulnerability.

When playing transfers, you can "just compete" by passing the response. For me, 1NT (3) 3 is weak or GF, not invitational.
0

#5 User is offline   Statto 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 636
  • Joined: 2011-December-01
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Location:UK
  • Interests:Bridge, Poker, but not in conflation.
    Statistics, but not massaged by the media.

Posted 2012-May-19, 00:38

View PostfromageGB, on 2012-May-15, 09:36, said:

I don't think denying a stopper is much use. Is partner supposed to take out to 4 of a minor on no fit when he does not have solid stops? So for me 3NT and X are bid with similar hands, but depending on vulnerability.

3NT probably has a stopper or something in reserve. X is for penalty and may not have a stopper, or may not have quite the values for 3NT. And yes, vulnerability is a factor.

If you agree X for take-out at the 3 level you will want partner to reopen with X for take-out on any suitable hand, otherwise you give opps a free ride, but that has its own inherent risks, particularly when our side is vul.
A perfection of means, and confusion of aims, seems to be our main problem – Albert Einstein
0

#6 User is offline   steve2005 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,164
  • Joined: 2010-April-22
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Hamilton, Canada
  • Interests:Bridge duh!

Posted 2012-May-21, 16:07

View PostfromageGB, on 2012-May-15, 09:30, said:

I agree with the transfers and most of the rest, but when partner (opener) has a hand that has a minimum of 2 of their suit, is fairly balanced, and has considerable limited strength, I think there is a lot of merit in X for penalty. This is a completely different situation from a jump over partner's one of a suit open.

It is also different in that while with a low doubleton opener may reopen with a X after a 2 level overcall, he will not be doing that with a 3 level overcall.

Have to agree. while the transfer sytem is good if its hard to penalize 3 level overcall its just a license to steal.
Sarcasm is a state of mind
1

#7 User is offline   the hog 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-March-07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Laos
  • Interests:Wagner and Bridge

Posted 2012-May-21, 17:59

View PostHanoi5, on 2012-May-14, 21:02, said:

So, your partner opens 1NT and the next player pre-empts naturally at the 3 level. What are you to do?

There's another topic covering the question of whether to use a bid a transfer or texas, but what is the best use for the double? Would 3NT show or deny the stopper? can we 'just' compete at the three (or four?) level?

I use the same structure of the 4-level for this situations, so in theory I won't have a problem if they 'psych' but is this reason enough for that treatment?


What am I going to do? Look for my hand. Did I drop my cards under the table?
"The King of Hearts a broadsword bears, the Queen of Hearts a rose." W. H. Auden.
0

#8 User is offline   Statto 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 636
  • Joined: 2011-December-01
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Location:UK
  • Interests:Bridge, Poker, but not in conflation.
    Statistics, but not massaged by the media.

Posted 2012-May-21, 18:43

View Postthe hog, on 2012-May-21, 17:59, said:

What am I going to do? Look for my hand. Did I drop my cards under the table?

hehe :P
A perfection of means, and confusion of aims, seems to be our main problem – Albert Einstein
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users