BBO Discussion Forums: Correct SAYC auction - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Correct SAYC auction Is there an option?

Poll: Exit stage left --- Exit stage right (29 member(s) have cast votes)

What is the "Correct" SAYC auction

  1. 2H (transfer to Spades) intending a later jump to 3NT (27 votes [93.10%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 93.10%

  2. 3NT - thereby averting ANY discussion of distribution (2 votes [6.90%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 6.90%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   JonnyQuest 

  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 85
  • Joined: 2012-May-02

Posted 2012-May-02, 19:18

IMP's

Vulnerable vs. Not-Vul

Partner, in 2nd seat opens 1NT (SAYC so 15-17).

What do you respond, with the condition it be a "Correct SAYC" auction? :blink:



Thanks!
1

#2 User is offline   dkham 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 181
  • Joined: 2008-December-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Glasgow

Posted 2012-May-03, 03:34

Is this poll to settle an argument?
1

#3 User is offline   Antrax 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,458
  • Joined: 2011-March-15
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2012-May-03, 04:09

I think you're only supposed to play in 3NT over 4M with extra HCPs in matchpoints.
0

#4 User is offline   gordontd 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,485
  • Joined: 2009-July-14
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London

Posted 2012-May-03, 04:48

If you don't transfer to spades, you don't give yourself the chance to find a slam if partner breaks the transfer.
Gordon Rainsford
London UK
0

#5 User is offline   campboy 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,347
  • Joined: 2009-July-21

Posted 2012-May-03, 16:48

It might be worth including Stayman as an option. Golden mean fallacy? Never heard of it.
0

#6 User is offline   masse24 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 342
  • Joined: 2009-April-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Chicago Suburbs

Posted 2012-May-05, 23:00

View PostAntrax, on 2012-May-03, 04:09, said:

I think you're only supposed to play in 3NT over 4M with extra HCPs in matchpoints.


This.

I absolutely transfer with this hand.
Why give up on a potential 9 card fit (or even 10)?
Why give up on exploring slam were opener to super-accept?

Would be shocked to see any other answer. :blink:
“Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.” George Carlin
0

#7 User is offline   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,289
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2012-May-07, 04:49

Transfer, followed by 3NT.

If you hit partner with a super accept, than 6S is a real option.

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

4 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 4 guests, 0 anonymous users