Help
topic description speaks for itself
seems like they have gone from workable to crap shoot
will take awhile to work it out, they are not very constructive anymore
Page 1 of 1
Major weak two gib ver 22 anyone think they suck
#2
- Group: Yellows
- Posts: 1,317
- Joined: 2007-December-30
- Gender:Male
- Location:Bulgaria
Posted 2012-April-25, 23:20
could you provide an example of these bad openings?
and how often do you encounter this in openings if you can evaluate in general?
and how often do you encounter this in openings if you can evaluate in general?
#3
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 6,542
- Joined: 2010-February-01
- Gender:Male
- Location:Brooklyn, NY, USA
Posted 2012-April-26, 06:53
georgi, on 2012-April-20, 16:11, said:
Bbradley62, on 2012-April-20, 13:44, said:
GIB's convention card says "normally good 6-card suit" and the systems notes say "Disciplined, with honors in the suit". [After the recent update,] what does or does not qualify?
I think it's pretty clear that pigpenz is saying that QJxxxx does not fit the descriptions "good 6-card suit" and "disciplined, with honors in the suit".
#4
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 2,554
- Joined: 2005-April-25
Posted 2012-April-26, 08:38
just noticing that the hands it now opens weak two, it looks like player are having a little problem
adjusting to them, they dont seem to be as constructive as they were before.It just takes some time to get
used too.
alot of vul openings on lousy suits with singleton honors on the side....is fine as long as you know its coming.
not quite Bergen-Cohen.
I would also think you could run bridgebrowser to test how the weak two bids are since the update.
adjusting to them, they dont seem to be as constructive as they were before.It just takes some time to get
used too.
alot of vul openings on lousy suits with singleton honors on the side....is fine as long as you know its coming.
not quite Bergen-Cohen.
I would also think you could run bridgebrowser to test how the weak two bids are since the update.
Page 1 of 1