North thought the double was showing a good hand with no clear direction, whereas South thought it was penalties. 3♥ made 9 tricks on our defence.
A bad night at the club - 3
#1
Posted 2012-March-26, 16:53
North thought the double was showing a good hand with no clear direction, whereas South thought it was penalties. 3♥ made 9 tricks on our defence.
#2
Posted 2012-March-26, 17:31
"...we live off being battle-scarred veterans who manage to hate our opponents slightly more than we hate each other. -- Hamman, re: Wolff
#3
Posted 2012-March-27, 02:57
#4
Posted 2012-March-27, 02:58
And here: East freely bids hearts, West raised. They should have 9-10 hearts. This makes a penalty double impossible.
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#5
Posted 2012-March-27, 04:22
ahydra
#6
Posted 2012-March-27, 05:56
South might pass a "good hand with no clear direction" double anyway: from his point of view 3NT doesn't look attractive. It looks like 3♥ should go down on normal defence - after two rounds of clubs, declarer has to draw trumps to avoid a promotion, but now he has only eight tricks.
This post has been edited by gnasher: 2012-March-27, 05:58
#7
Posted 2012-March-27, 08:14
#8
Posted 2012-March-27, 12:51
(2) Given that he didn't redouble and it came back around to him, why is he not worth 4♣ now? Partner cannot know about the club length or the 12 working HCP.
(3) Where on earth did they find 9 tricks in 3♥?
#9
Posted 2012-March-27, 16:07
HighLow21, on 2012-March-27, 12:51, said:
(2) Given that he didn't redouble and it came back around to him, why is he not worth 4♣ now? Partner cannot know about the club length or the 12 working HCP.
(3) Where on earth did they find 9 tricks in 3♥?
(1) Maybe 2C is forcing and redouble shows more scattered values. It's not an uncommon agreement.
(2) Because a takeout double suggests all that plus 4 diamonds.
(3) It's not clear how, but the defence doesn't need to help declarer all that much to give up a ninth trick.
#10
Posted 2012-March-27, 16:25
sfi, on 2012-March-27, 16:07, said:
(2) Because a takeout double suggests all that plus 4 diamonds.
(3) It's not clear how, but the defence doesn't need to help declarer all that much to give up a ninth trick.
Pretty much. I would certainly have redoubled with 4 hearts (maybe with only 3), but here I thought it more important to show my club suit. I did double because I wanted to bring diamonds into the picture. I can't remember where we dropped a trick.
#11
Posted 2012-March-27, 20:27
If 2 ♣ is non forcing, constructive, then the Dbl of 3 ♥ shows extra values and a willingness to compete further.
If the 2 ♣ bid is forcing and shows about opening values, then the Dbl is strictly penalty. There's no need to show willingness to compete further as South should know North has at least the values to do so. So North's choices for calls are pass, raise partner's suit, or bid another suit.
#12
Posted 2012-March-27, 20:34
rmnka447, on 2012-March-27, 20:27, said:
If 2 ♣ is non forcing, constructive, then the Dbl of 3 ♥ shows extra values and a willingness to compete further.
If the 2 ♣ bid is forcing and shows about opening values, then the Dbl is strictly penalty. There's no need to show willingness to compete further as South should know North has at least the values to do so. So North's choices for calls are pass, raise partner's suit, or bid another suit.
2♣ is forcing for 1 round (not GF), usually 10+ points and 5+♣.