How would you bid these, II
#1
Posted 2012-February-17, 12:58
♠ A 9 7 6 4
♥ A J
♦ 7 4 2
♣ J 8 7
Partner has:
♠ 10
♥ Q 10 5 3 2
♦ 8
♣ A K Q 10 5 4
You pass, LHO opens 2♦, RHO bids 4♦, if possible.
You've agreed on weak/strong Michaels over 1-bids, and you can infer them over 2-bids. The rest is up to you.
(I'll post our auction later; it was . . . interesting.)
"If you're driving [the Honda S2000] with the top up, the storm outside had better have a name."
Simplify the complicated side; don't complify the simplicated side.
#2
Posted 2012-February-17, 12:59
5♣
#3
Posted 2012-February-17, 15:37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d939/7d939770e447b147fd6d342b81fef775dd3a5660" alt=":("
I play leaping michaels as forcing althou not neccesarilly strong. A good question is if this sets up a forcing pass, then responder could pass to investigate if partner has spades and clubs, then he might try slam.
#4
Posted 2012-February-17, 15:58
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0731/f07315330c72d721a433df91b1dcf64ddc348248" alt=":)"
But I do honestly not know, whether I would upgrate the hand to 4 ♣, bid my major or my best suit. I guess, with a passed partner, I would try 3 ♣ intending to bid 3 ♥ over a possible 3 ♦.
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#5
Posted 2012-February-17, 17:13
Codo, on 2012-February-17, 15:58, said:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0731/f07315330c72d721a433df91b1dcf64ddc348248" alt=":)"
But I do honestly not know, whether I would upgrate the hand to 4 ♣, bid my major or my best suit. I guess, with a passed partner, I would try 3 ♣ intending to bid 3 ♥ over a possible 3 ♦.
Andy didn't define what his 4♣-jump was called .
I think it is a Roman Jump ( the suit bid and the next higher unbid )... a type of "Leaping Michaels" for 2-suiter overcalls.
Another "jump" method I ran across sometime back for use over a Weak-2D is:
4D = majors
3H = ♥/♣
3S = ♠/♣ and
3D = stop-ask
TWOferBRIDGE
"imo by far in bridge the least understood concept is how to bid over a jump-shift
( 1M-1NT!-3m-?? )." ....Justin Lall
" Did someone mention relays? " .... Zelandakh
K-Rex to Mikeh : " Sometimes you drive me nuts " .
#6
Posted 2012-February-18, 04:29
#7
Posted 2012-February-18, 09:59
and the power btn the hands appears to be at best split
or in favor of the opps. 3c rates to be a lot safer and
keeps 3n in play.
after 4d it becomes apparent p has something over there
and I would bid 4h which should leave p well placed
to pick btn hearts and clubs though admittedly it will
be far from clear you have 5 hearts.
#8
Posted 2012-February-18, 18:18
gnasher, on 2012-February-17, 12:59, said:
5♣
What is 4S? pass or correct or some kind of slam try? I think north not even trying for slam is pretty ridiculous, he has a monster hand esp opposite a diamond void which is likely at these colors.
#9
Posted 2012-February-19, 06:15
We're quite short of slam tries in this sequence - 4♥ and 4♠ are pass-or-correct and 5♣ is to play. That leaves 4NT. What do you think it should mean?
#10
Posted 2012-February-19, 09:46
gnasher, on 2012-February-17, 12:59, said:
( p ) 5♣
gnasher, on 2012-February-18, 04:29, said:
4♣ is a flawed bid since it doesn't immediately show BOTH suits as Leaping Michaels does over a weak 2Major.
That is why I prefer Roman Jumps over a weak-2D ( as in my post # 5 ) .
Now a 4♠ bid is clearly a Ctrl cue ( for trump suit,♥ or ♣, to be decided later ) .
5♦ = Ctrl cue
5NT = pick-a-small slam
TWOferBRIDGE
"imo by far in bridge the least understood concept is how to bid over a jump-shift
( 1M-1NT!-3m-?? )." ....Justin Lall
" Did someone mention relays? " .... Zelandakh
K-Rex to Mikeh : " Sometimes you drive me nuts " .
#11
Posted 2012-February-19, 14:49
gnasher, on 2012-February-19, 06:15, said:
We're quite short of slam tries in this sequence - 4♥ and 4♠ are pass-or-correct and 5♣ is to play. That leaves 4NT. What do you think it should mean?
I always played 4C as forcing, so it seems to me like pass should be forcing, or if pass is not forcing that double should mean something that is not penalty. I have never discussed any of that though.