What is this double in you partnership ?
#1
Posted 2012-February-10, 12:52
pass dbl
Please no "in pick-up partnership this is...", this is serious question about the best agreement, not about practical choices when you don't know and have to guess.
So... ?
#2
Posted 2012-February-10, 13:07
wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:
rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:
My YouTube Channel
#6
Posted 2012-February-10, 14:29
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#7
Posted 2012-February-10, 14:31
"...we live off being battle-scarred veterans who manage to hate our opponents slightly more than we hate each other. -- Hamman, re: Wolff
#8
Posted 2012-February-10, 15:04
Phil, on 2012-February-10, 14:29, said:
If you think that there are some hands that might want to bid 4♠, shouldn't you use double for that hand-type instead?
#9
Posted 2012-February-10, 15:16
Phil, on 2012-February-10, 14:29, said:
gnasher, on 2012-February-10, 15:04, said:
I think Phil was not asking a question. I smiled, anyway; if it wasn't an attempt at irony or some other form of humor, it served that purpose for me.
#10
Posted 2012-February-10, 15:16
Quote
I have opinion of two world champions, granted in some toy categories (juniors and univ) but still who think it's for takeout so don't be so fast to judge...
Quote
Well... what about: KQxx - KJTxx JT9x, aren't you tempted to fight ?
#11
Posted 2012-February-10, 15:21
wyman, on 2012-February-10, 14:31, said:
bluecalm, on 2012-February-10, 15:16, said:
wyman, on 2012-February-10, 14:31, said:
#12
Posted 2012-February-10, 15:51
bluecalm, on 2012-February-10, 15:16, said:
I would have doubled 1♥ with that. I think that applies to all three-suiters that might want to act at the four-level.
If there's a hand where you might want to act, it must be a two-suiter.
#13
Posted 2012-February-10, 15:51
bluecalm, on 2012-February-10, 15:16, said:
Well... what about: KQxx - KJTxx JT9x, aren't you tempted to fight ?
Thats an auto DBL of 1♥
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#15
Posted 2012-February-10, 16:04
- 4 or 5 good hearts, penalties, or
- void heart, very distributional, not strong enough to act over 1H
which is playable
#16
Posted 2012-February-10, 16:33
Phil, on 2012-February-10, 14:29, said:
To me 4♠ if vulnerability is friendly is something like this if i am playing with a conservative preempter, basically gambling (some call it completing the xfer) ;
Jxxxxx
x
Kxxx
xx
Unless of course our style allows us to overcall 2♠ with this at the first place. Call me maniac but thats 2♠ overcall for me at favourable or equal. I find this more comfy than talking myself into bidding or passing over 4♥
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#17
Posted 2012-February-10, 17:18
1♥ pass 3♥ pass
pass dbl = ?
Btw, I doubled with KJT8x of trumps on previous one and I still stand for penalty but I can see argument for playing this as t/o and I don't consider it ridiculous at all.
#18
Posted 2012-February-11, 03:20
bluecalm, on 2012-February-10, 17:18, said:
1♥ pass 3♥ pass
pass dbl = ?
I can imagine wanting to make a three-suited takeout double at this level, with a 40xx shape which is just too weak for a double of 1♥, eg K10xx - KJTxx JT9x. That's certainly more likely than a penalty double.
#19
Posted 2012-February-11, 03:24
bluecalm, on 2012-February-10, 17:18, said:
It's unusual for the defenders to have five trumps on this auction. What sort of hand did responder have?