BBO Discussion Forums: why arent we playing Ripstra? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

why arent we playing Ripstra?

#1 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2012-February-05, 04:23

Ace king of spades lead. RHO plays the jack then the 7. Opps are not too good.<br>

... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#2 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2012-February-05, 04:25

Ps you can safely assume opener has no 5cM
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#3 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2012-February-05, 08:15

I'm a big fan of landy, but 2C here? Wow, these Dutch you play with are hyper.

I would lead a diamond towards the king. If it wins I may get to ruff three spades. If it loses I haven't lost much.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#4 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2012-February-05, 08:47

Even if the diamond loses you'll still make if LHO is 4=4=2=3: win the heart return, ruff another spade, club to dummy, A, three more rounds of clubs.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#5 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2012-February-05, 10:08

Btw what do you think of 3C from S instead of passing out the x?
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#6 User is offline   Trinidad 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,531
  • Joined: 2005-October-09
  • Location:Netherlands

Posted 2012-February-05, 11:49

Because you, Han, my wife and I are probably the only players in the Netherlands who know what Ripstra is... ;)

BTW, I agree with Han that your partner is hyper, but I have seen quite a few of these hyper players in the Netherlands. That is the reason why in the Netherlands I play penalty doubles at the two level when partner opens 1NT.

Rik
I want my opponents to leave my table with a smile on their face and without matchpoints on their score card - in that order.
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the new discoveries, is not “Eureka!” (I found it!), but “That’s funny…” – Isaac Asimov
The only reason God did not put "Thou shalt mind thine own business" in the Ten Commandments was that He thought that it was too obvious to need stating. - Kenberg
0

#7 User is offline   Trinidad 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,531
  • Joined: 2005-October-09
  • Location:Netherlands

Posted 2012-February-05, 11:53

View Postgwnn, on 2012-February-05, 10:08, said:

Btw what do you think of 3C from S instead of passing out the x?

That would have been good to do if partner's majors were swapped. But it would be bad if partner had the hand that he should have had.

Rik
I want my opponents to leave my table with a smile on their face and without matchpoints on their score card - in that order.
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the new discoveries, is not “Eureka!” (I found it!), but “That’s funny…” – Isaac Asimov
The only reason God did not put "Thou shalt mind thine own business" in the Ten Commandments was that He thought that it was too obvious to need stating. - Kenberg
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users