BBO Discussion Forums: Semantics - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Semantics Underleading an Ace

#1 User is offline   masse24 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 342
  • Joined: 2009-April-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Chicago Suburbs

Posted 2012-January-27, 19:21



1.) Is leading the ♥Q a good lead, a so-so lead, a flippin crazy why would you ever do this lead?

2.) Is leading the ♥Q "underleading an Ace"? Or, does the fact it is the "top of an interior sequence" negate that term.

3.) Is "underleading an Ace" ONLY a small card from Ace third or Ace fourth?


FWIW - yes, these are silly questions. Humor me. :blink:
“Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.” George Carlin
0

#2 User is offline   wyman 

  • Redoubling with gusto
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,712
  • Joined: 2009-October-19
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV
  • Interests:Math, Bridge, Beer. Often at the same time.

Posted 2012-January-27, 20:01

crazy imo, yes it is underleading, "underleading an ace" means leading any non-ace from a suit containing the ace.
"I think maybe so and so was caught cheating but maybe I don't have the names right". Sure, and I think maybe your mother .... Oh yeah, that was someone else maybe. -- kenberg

"...we live off being battle-scarred veterans who manage to hate our opponents slightly more than we hate each other.” -- Hamman, re: Wolff
0

#3 User is offline   dee_dee_20 

  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4
  • Joined: 2006-May-01
  • Gender:Female

Posted 2012-January-27, 21:12

View Postwyman, on 2012-January-27, 20:01, said:

crazy imo, yes it is underleading, "underleading an ace" means leading any non-ace from a suit containing the ace.


Flippin crazy IMO
0

#4 User is offline   Quartic 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 285
  • Joined: 2010-December-19
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:England
  • Interests:Walking, Climbing, Mathematics, Programming, Linux, Reading, Bridge.

Posted 2012-January-28, 01:55

I wouldn't lead a heart on this auction, Ace or otherwise. I'd lead a small diamond. Underleading an Ace against a suit contract works best when partner has the Q and declarer misguesses with the K in dummy.
0

#5 User is offline   FrancesHinden 

  • Limit bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,482
  • Joined: 2004-November-02
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:England
  • Interests:Bridge, classical music, skiing... but I spend more time earning a living than doing any of those

Posted 2012-January-28, 04:44

1) It might work, the king is quite likely to be in dummy. I don't think I'd do it, but I've seen worse.
2)/3) 'Underleading an ace' is leading any non-ace card against a suit contract from a suit containing the ace. (Other than a systemic King from AK, or Q from AKQ etc)
1
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users