Partner opens 2♠
2♠ (3♣) P (3N)
P (P) X
1. Does the double here ask partner to
a) lead their suit - here spades
b) lead dummy's suit - here clubs
c) has no specific meaning as to lead?
2. Given your answer, do you consider your answer "standard" or "by partnership agreement" ?
3. Do you happen to know where a discussion of this question is addressed in the published bridge literature?
Thanks.
Page 1 of 1
multi part question
#1
Posted 2012-January-21, 20:21
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly." MikeH
“Let me put it in words you might understand,” he said. “Mr. Trump, f–k off!” Anders Vistisen
“Let me put it in words you might understand,” he said. “Mr. Trump, f–k off!” Anders Vistisen
#2
Posted 2012-January-21, 21:00
Doesn't sound like an auction where I would want to lead spades without a solid sequence into the 3NT bidding whether partner doubles or not. Partners pass of 3C suggested she wasn't terribly concerned about defending 3C undoubled...thus not a whole slew of HCP.
So, without further looking at my hand, I would lead a spade with a KQ good sequence and an outside entry, but a club otherwise.
This is inferential, on my part. I don't think partner is demanding anything.
So, without further looking at my hand, I would lead a spade with a KQ good sequence and an outside entry, but a club otherwise.
This is inferential, on my part. I don't think partner is demanding anything.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
#4
Posted 2012-January-22, 14:52
2. By partnership agreement.
I think, on this auction, that partner is saying he has bonus high cards and a solid club holding over the bidder. I'd usually expect to lead a spade here, but I would look at my hand first.
3. I don't think it is.
I think, on this auction, that partner is saying he has bonus high cards and a solid club holding over the bidder. I'd usually expect to lead a spade here, but I would look at my hand first.
3. I don't think it is.
#5
Posted 2012-January-22, 15:30
Very much by partnership agreement.
We open particularly fruity weak 2s, meaning we can't raise with some holdings that you might standardly want to, so X says I have help.
We open particularly fruity weak 2s, meaning we can't raise with some holdings that you might standardly want to, so X says I have help.
#6
Posted 2012-January-23, 13:52
I think it suggests a spade lead but you definitely need an agreement. I'm sure there was something about this in Bridge World Standard but I can't find it now.
#7
Posted 2012-January-23, 15:43
I polled several friends and they all want this double to ask for red suit lead, probably hearts as it's the one suit opponents likely doesn't have.
I ten to agree with them but I can see arguments for other meanings.
I ten to agree with them but I can see arguments for other meanings.
#8
Posted 2012-January-23, 19:13
I agree with Frances
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari
#9
Posted 2012-January-24, 07:43
Here's my entry - the red suit X shows,
P implying the other red or notting.!
By agreement to lead spades through 1,2 times.
P implying the other red or notting.!
By agreement to lead spades through 1,2 times.
Page 1 of 1