NS are regular partner, playing precision, 1NT was alerted as 17~19 balanced, may have 5 card major. EW are pick up and is assumed to play standard carding.
W led ♥5, won by South's Q. South played ♣AT, West's K was dropped and pitch ♥2(assmue it's discourage), E won the T by Q. After that E returned a ♥, South made 1NT in the end(3♥4♣).
I am interested in the ♥ return. When East won with ♣Q declare is marked with 7 tricks and it looked like shifting was necessary. However, the careful analysis by E may end up in the conclusion that the contract is not beatable.
From East's perspective, 6 tricks in ♦+♠ is required to defeat the contract and partner, from the bidding, cannot have more than 8HCP on ♠+♦. Partner cannot have 5♠(otherwise why lead weaker ♥?), 5♦(1NT with stiff ♦?), or ♠AKQ so defender can take at most 2 tricks in ♠. Therefore the minimum combination to defeat the contract is ♠AQ♦QJ which added up to 9HCP, impossible. From this analysis it seems a passive ♥ return, even in IMP, is the correct play on this hand.
Question:
1. Is the analysis above correct?
2. If you're East, do you trust your analysis and play to reduce overtrick, or you still want to defeat the contract based on the assumption that partner makes a bad lead or declare makes aggressive upgrade in bidding(e.g. treating ♠K984♥AKQ♦93♣AT93 as 17HCP).
3. What's your play, after winning ♣Q, in IMP, if 1NT shows 16~18?
4. What's your play, after winning ♣Q, in MP, if 1NT shows 16~18?