BBO Discussion Forums: Powerful hand at MPs without stopper - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Powerful hand at MPs without stopper

#1 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2012-January-05, 16:31

109x
Qx
AJxx
KQJx

All vul, MPs, RHO deals and opens 1


(1)-pass-(pass)-2
(2)-??
0

#2 User is online   mike777 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 16,845
  • Joined: 2003-October-07
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2012-January-05, 16:41

I will try 2nt


I think it shouldshow this type of hand, basically a scramble.

In any event a good hand to discuss later in the bar if 2nt in comp should ever be natural.
0

#3 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2012-January-06, 03:07

I'd make a takeout double.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#4 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2012-January-06, 03:59

I can think of three alternatives: doblo, contro and doublet.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#5 User is offline   Phil 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,092
  • Joined: 2008-December-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:North Texas, USA
  • Interests:Mountain Biking

Posted 2012-January-06, 09:10

Double is penalty for me. As I type this I'm thinking, "maybe it is for me, but I'm not sure the case in any of my partnerships".

So when Pclayton partners Phil he needs to bid 2N for takeout. Otherwise its a x.
Hi y'all!

Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
0

#6 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2012-January-06, 10:05

View PostPhil, on 2012-January-06, 09:10, said:

Double is penalty for me. As I type this I'm thinking, "maybe it is for me, but I'm not sure the case in any of my partnerships".

So when Pclayton partners Phil he needs to bid 2N for takeout. Otherwise its a x.


Sorry Phil, don´t you think 2NT natural with 13-15 and some stopper is much more likelly than take out?, or at least frequent enough that an easy to forget convention liek 2NT is not worth it.
0

#7 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2012-January-06, 10:25

Obvious TO dbl if you're playing that way. Otherwise it's a somewhat shaky, but acceptable, 2NT bid (shows 13-14; exactly what you have).
0

#8 User is online   mike777 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 16,845
  • Joined: 2003-October-07
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2012-January-06, 11:04

I think Lawrence plays double here as penalty, interesting everyone here plays it takeout.

Not sure what x is here in BWS.
0

#9 User is offline   Phil 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,092
  • Joined: 2008-December-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:North Texas, USA
  • Interests:Mountain Biking

Posted 2012-January-06, 11:10

View PostFluffy, on 2012-January-06, 10:05, said:

Sorry Phil, don´t you think 2NT natural with 13-15 and some stopper is much more likelly than take out?, or at least frequent enough that an easy to forget convention liek 2NT is not worth it.


I don't know there is a wide spectrum of hands that cannot push to 3N, nor wants to make a penalty x of 2.

Anyway, 2N in competition isn't natural (for me), and 2N as takeout makes perfect sense in this context.
Hi y'all!

Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
0

#10 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2012-January-06, 11:30

I think that the most useful meaning for 2NT is as a good raise in hearts.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#11 User is offline   Phil 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,092
  • Joined: 2008-December-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:North Texas, USA
  • Interests:Mountain Biking

Posted 2012-January-06, 11:35

View Postgnasher, on 2012-January-06, 11:30, said:

I think that the most useful meaning for 2NT is as a good raise in hearts.


+1. Should have thought of that.
Hi y'all!

Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
0

#12 User is offline   jmcw 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 662
  • Joined: 2008-October-15

Posted 2012-January-06, 11:45

I dunno what 2Nt is here, so I'm not bidding it.

If its t/o to a minor then it seems reasonable, but risky.
If its a good raise then I don't have it.
If its natural then I don't have that either.

I'll try 3, but not real happy about it.
1

#13 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2012-January-06, 15:45

View Postgnasher, on 2012-January-06, 11:30, said:

I think that the most useful meaning for 2NT is as a good raise in hearts.


-1. The 12-14 balanced hand that passes 1x is extremely common and you need 2NT to show it.
0

#14 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2012-January-07, 23:11

I asked partner after hand and he said as some local experts that double is penalty so would pass, its not like its a dreadful contract, but can´t be beaten with Qx onside for declarer and 2 side aces.


3-> -100
2-> -110
2NT -> -300
2X -> -670
0

#15 User is offline   Mbodell 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,871
  • Joined: 2007-April-22
  • Location:Santa Clara, CA

Posted 2012-January-08, 00:12

Put me in the camp of X is penalty and 2nt is scrambling.

If you have 12-14 or 13-15 and spades stopped and partner has his bid then we've got decent chances to set him.
0

#16 User is online   mike777 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 16,845
  • Joined: 2003-October-07
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2012-January-08, 00:23

I noted Lawrence and many experts play x as penalty but many on bbo play it as t/o so not sure there is an expert standard......


no one has explained what it is in BWS yet.
0

#17 User is offline   aguahombre 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,029
  • Joined: 2009-February-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St. George, UT

Posted 2012-January-08, 00:38

View PostMbodell, on 2012-January-08, 00:12, said:

Put me in the camp of X is penalty and 2nt is scrambling.

If you have 12-14 or 13-15 and spades stopped and partner has his bid then we've got decent chances to set him.

Just to clear my confusion, would:

KTX
QX
AJXX
QJ9X

fall within what you said? Or would we need one less minor suit card and one more spade to fit your "penalty" definition?

The OP hand feels like a 2NT bid; but unlike some "scrambles" it shows tolerance for hearts and strength.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
0

#18 User is offline   Free 

  • mmm Duvel
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-July-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Belgium
  • Interests:Duvel, Whisky

Posted 2012-January-08, 03:51

I would Dbl for takeout, it's imo much more frequent to have a takeout hand (because you don't have you couldn't Dbl the previous round) than a penalty Dbl behind a 6-card suit.
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
0

#19 User is offline   aguahombre 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,029
  • Joined: 2009-February-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St. George, UT

Posted 2012-January-08, 15:27

Yes, but even though your frequency estimate is correct, u still could have 2NT for a scramble with good cards, not 5-5 minors. Don't need to lose the penalty just because it is rare.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
0

#20 User is offline   FrancesHinden 

  • Limit bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,482
  • Joined: 2004-November-02
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:England
  • Interests:Bridge, classical music, skiing... but I spend more time earning a living than doing any of those

Posted 2012-January-08, 15:30

I also think 2NT is natural, but it shows spades (well) stopped. On this hand I would double. I've got 2S to show a heart raise.
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

7 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 7 guests, 0 anonymous users