BBO Discussion Forums: Splinter, Jacoby 2NT or what? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Splinter, Jacoby 2NT or what?

#21 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2012-January-03, 14:59

View Postmikeh, on 2012-January-03, 11:12, said:

Normally a splinter isn't a captaincy-grabbing call

Indeed. It's quite the opposite: show the support and shortness and leave it to pard, whose hand is way more undefined. This is why a splinter should IMO be limited to some 14 or so.
0

#22 User is online   mike777 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 16,833
  • Joined: 2003-October-07
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2012-January-03, 15:26

This is a frequent issue here on the forums.

Pard opens a major, we have 4 card support and a good side suit.

I think for B/I players, me, we almost always show our 4 card support and ask pard to describe their hand further.

Very good players seem to not worry about the 4th support card and show their side suit first.
0

#23 User is offline   FrancesHinden 

  • Limit bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,482
  • Joined: 2004-November-02
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:England
  • Interests:Bridge, classical music, skiing... but I spend more time earning a living than doing any of those

Posted 2012-January-03, 15:41

I nearly always show my 4-card support first, and I would do so on this hand. The only time I make a 2/1 with 4-card support is when I plan to take control of the auction later.
But that is because I have good agreements after Jacoby (and good agreements after a void splinter, although this hand is too good for my void splinters).
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users