Help
♠Q9xx
♥Kxx
♦108xx
♣Kx
All vulnerable RHO deals and opens
(1♥)-pass-(2♥)-3♦
(3♥)-??
Page 1 of 1
competing vulnerable at MPs
#1
- World International Master without a clue
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 17,404
- Joined: 2003-November-13
- Gender:Male
- Location:madrid
Posted 2011-December-30, 07:47
#2
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 14,900
- Joined: 2004-May-11
- Gender:Male
- Location:Portugal
- Interests:Everything!
Posted 2011-December-30, 07:48
Defensive hand and pard might have a below average hand. I say let it be.
#3
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 12,029
- Joined: 2009-February-21
- Gender:Male
- Location:St. George, UT
Posted 2011-December-30, 08:56
Partner knows prebalancing. I don't want to discourage her from doing so in the future.
PASS.
PASS.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
#4
- Modern Day Trebuchet Enthusiast
-
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 738
- Joined: 2007-October-17
- Gender:Male
- Location:Western Mass.
Posted 2011-December-30, 12:47
How about 3♠ which is hopefully fit-showing with only 4 spades. Sometimes we get to play at the 3 level then, and from the right side!
3NT could be right too. (xxx, x, AKxxxx, Axx)
I think I need coffee before I look at this hand again.
3NT could be right too. (xxx, x, AKxxxx, Axx)
I think I need coffee before I look at this hand again.
I once yelled at my partner for discarding the 'wrong' card when he was subjected to a squeeze that I allowed by giving the wrong count with too high a card. Now he's allowed to pitch aces when the opponents have the king in the dummy. At trick 2. When he could have followed suit. And blame me.
East4Evil ♥ sohcahtoa 4ever!!!!!1
East4Evil ♥ sohcahtoa 4ever!!!!!1
#5
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 815
- Joined: 2009-August-31
Posted 2011-December-30, 13:55
depends on agreements, I have partners I'd bid 4D with and partner's id pass immediately with.
Aaron Jones Unit 557
www.longbeachbridge.com
www.longbeachbridge.com
#6
- Csaba the Hutt
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 13,027
- Joined: 2006-June-16
- Gender:Male
- Interests:bye
Posted 2011-December-30, 14:33
easy pass.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
George Carlin
George Carlin
#7
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 3,214
- Joined: 2007-December-16
- Location:Pasadena, CA
Posted 2011-December-30, 15:09
I would bid 4D. FWIW I really don't think it's easy to double someone on this auction, most people are glad to have pushed you to 4m, so -100 into their 140 is a very likely occurrence.
#8
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 175
- Joined: 2003-October-20
Posted 2011-December-30, 16:04
Well, if u r sure 4♦ wont be dbled, then it is easy. On the other hand if opps r awake they realise that -100 is very close to zero if they have 140 coming to they side, so dbling our 4♦ wont cost much even if it makes.
-200 on the other hand is a kiss of death in MP`s so raising u prds 3 ♦ to 4 aint so clear cut.
-200 on the other hand is a kiss of death in MP`s so raising u prds 3 ♦ to 4 aint so clear cut.
#9
- Andy Bowles
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 11,993
- Joined: 2007-May-03
- Gender:Male
- Location:London, UK
Posted 2011-December-30, 17:04
Pass. We may well beat 3♥ with 4♦ going down. Also, on some of the hands where we belong in 4♦ partner will act again.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
#10
- VIP Member
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 6,971
- Joined: 2009-November-14
- Gender:Male
- Location:Houston, TX
Posted 2011-December-30, 23:34
Pass would not even occur to me tbh. Pd's overcall is much more promising than 1♥-2♦ overcall.
EDIT : If i knew we will be doubled in 4♦, i would be even happier to bid 4♦. But i really play this as support and not broke. Otherwise my concern would be to be lifted to 5♦ frequently, rather than being doubled in 4♦.
EDIT : If i knew we will be doubled in 4♦, i would be even happier to bid 4♦. But i really play this as support and not broke. Otherwise my concern would be to be lifted to 5♦ frequently, rather than being doubled in 4♦.
"Genius has its own limitations, however stupidity has no such boundaries!"
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#11
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 10,728
- Joined: 2003-March-07
- Gender:Male
- Location:Laos
- Interests:Wagner and Bridge
Posted 2011-December-31, 00:23
This is very close to a 3NT bid. Give me the A of S instead of the Q and 3NT it is.
"The King of Hearts a broadsword bears, the Queen of Hearts a rose." W. H. Auden.
#12
- World International Master without a clue
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 17,404
- Joined: 2003-November-13
- Gender:Male
- Location:madrid
Posted 2012-January-03, 04:49
4♦ -1 undoubled was a top, but even -170 was a good one. I think I would had doubled 4♥ coming back, that would be the bottom.
#13
- VIP Member
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 6,971
- Joined: 2009-November-14
- Gender:Male
- Location:Houston, TX
Posted 2012-January-04, 01:41
Fluffy, on 2012-January-03, 04:49, said:
4♦ -1 undoubled was a top, but even -170 was a good one. I think I would had doubled 4♥ coming back, that would be the bottom.
What was the whole deal ?
"Genius has its own limitations, however stupidity has no such boundaries!"
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#14
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 575
- Joined: 2006-November-07
Posted 2012-January-04, 03:29
rogerclee, on 2011-December-30, 15:09, said:
I would bid 4D. FWIW I really don't think it's easy to double someone on this auction, most people are glad to have pushed you to 4m, so -100 into their 140 is a very likely occurrence.
One reason why they'll find it hard to double is that RHO will rarely have a good enough hand to double 4♦ when all he could was just compete to 3♥. But if LHO has a maximum for his 2♥ and most likely only 3♥s for his raise, he's likely to double, don't you think ?
Seeking input from anyone who doesn't frequently "wtp", "Lol" or post to merely "Agree with ..."
#15
- World International Master without a clue
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 17,404
- Joined: 2003-November-13
- Gender:Male
- Location:madrid
Posted 2012-January-04, 03:59
MrAce, on 2012-January-04, 01:41, said:
What was the whole deal ?
I only remember LHO had ♦Q stff and RHO ♦Ax
After the hand RHO comented something about 3♥ being intended as invitational.
Page 1 of 1