Page 1 of 1
The final swing board
#1
Posted 2011-November-10, 06:20
Finals of knockouts, up by 3 after first half, second half seems fairly flat until the penultimate board:
If no one comes from the future to stop you from doing it then how bad a decision could it really be?
#2
Posted 2011-November-10, 07:41
6♠, hard to get to a better contract I believe. Maybe 5♥. I'd be afraid of partner passing 5♣.
wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:
Also, he rates to not have a heart void when he leads the ♥3.
rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:
Besides playing for fun, most people also like to play bridge to win
My YouTube Channel
#3
Posted 2011-November-10, 08:11
5N GSF comes to mind, unlucky if partner has xxxxxx, Ax, KQJx, x or similar.
#5
Posted 2011-November-10, 17:31
its a 5-7 hand, or even 4-7 is possible. Well, actually AKxxx doesn't make 7 on a diamond lead unless partner has ♣10. Call me chicken, but I would pass.
#6
Posted 2011-November-10, 17:38
It feels like one should be in slam, but its tough to picture hands where 6S has more play than 6C, and very easy to find the reverse, so it seems like one should bid 6C.
You could trivially just be in a 4-3 spade fit here? ATxx Kxx KQx xxx or similar is a normal 4S bid, though some might open this.
You could trivially just be in a 4-3 spade fit here? ATxx Kxx KQx xxx or similar is a normal 4S bid, though some might open this.
The physics is theoretical, but the fun is real. - Sheldon Cooper
#8
Posted 2011-November-10, 19:37
Interesting OP did not even put 6♣ in options. And considers the bids out of list as "creative"
If LHO is not hiding his fit, pd seems to have 4♥+some number of ♠ cards. The possibility of pd holding 4♥ makes it even more interesting because that may very well be the reason why he did not open weak 2♠. If he has only 1 ♠ honor, i am pretty confident he has either ♦ values or long ♠.
On the other hand if he has something like
Kxxxx
Qxxx
QJx
x
Then 6♣ seems a better contract, even if they can find ♠ ruff because then we were going down in 6♠ also. If pd has HTxxx(x) ♠ i would always wanna be in 6♠ because the location of ♦K is not clear and i anticipate a ♥ lead most of the time.
I would not pass 4♠ thats for sure, and i would not worry about grandslam either although it is possible. I would probably talk myself into bidding 6♣ at the end.
If LHO is not hiding his fit, pd seems to have 4♥+some number of ♠ cards. The possibility of pd holding 4♥ makes it even more interesting because that may very well be the reason why he did not open weak 2♠. If he has only 1 ♠ honor, i am pretty confident he has either ♦ values or long ♠.
On the other hand if he has something like
Kxxxx
Qxxx
QJx
x
Then 6♣ seems a better contract, even if they can find ♠ ruff because then we were going down in 6♠ also. If pd has HTxxx(x) ♠ i would always wanna be in 6♠ because the location of ♦K is not clear and i anticipate a ♥ lead most of the time.
I would not pass 4♠ thats for sure, and i would not worry about grandslam either although it is possible. I would probably talk myself into bidding 6♣ at the end.
"Genius has its own limitations, however stupidity has no such boundaries!"
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#9
Posted 2011-November-10, 20:14
Have a standard agreement with my old partner that all jumps (except to a Game or NT) are showing good suit with fit, in this sort of sequence after a t/o double it would only show a 3 card or Honour-Honour doubleton fit. So I'd use 6♣ here to show that, pards can decide if 6 ♠ is better.
#10
Posted 2011-November-11, 09:54
I like 6C. We need very little for slam and clubs is quite likely the right strain.
Of course we might have a grand slam, but it's hard to have a good investigation and if we try, we might get to the wrong strain. I think it is better to bid clubs clearly.
Of course we might have a grand slam, but it's hard to have a good investigation and if we try, we might get to the wrong strain. I think it is better to bid clubs clearly.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.
- hrothgar
- hrothgar
#11
Posted 2011-November-13, 14:29

Page 1 of 1