Thank you
Puppet with 6 Hearts and 4 Spades ACBL
#1
Posted 2011-November-07, 08:54
Thank you
#2
Posted 2011-November-07, 09:27
If that is your agreement, you still can delay Texas to hearts. With a four card major and diamonds, the puppeteer could have shown which major by bidding the other one, then removed 3NT to 4D.
If 3NT is your partnership's answer to puppet with this hand, I wouldn't know whether 4D is delay Texas or not. Maybe that is one reason people are using 3D as either/or.
#3
Posted 2011-November-07, 09:28
-gwnn
#4
Posted 2011-November-07, 09:28
#5
Posted 2011-November-07, 09:29
2N-3♦
3♥-3♠
4♣*-4♥
*either unknown cue or flag for hearts
S should make a 3-card superaccept in hearts BTW. However, maybe you didn't discuss those.
George Carlin
#6
Posted 2011-November-07, 18:18
We are assured of at least a 6-2 heart fit, and it is easy to construct hands on which the 6-2 (or 6-3/6-4) heart fit is superior to the hypothetical 4-4 spade fit, and less easy (tho not impossible) to construct hands on which the 4-4 is better. Of course, we may have a 5-4 spade fit, but the odds of that don't seem high enough, to me, to warrant worrying about.
I'd be more inclined to explore a 4-4 spade fit if my hand offered hope for slam, but it doesn't.
#7
Posted 2011-November-08, 03:36
Note: it's one of the reasons why 5♠-4♥ usually get a seperate response. You can't transfer and show ♥ below 3NT... With 5♥-4♠ it's not a problem.
#8
Posted 2011-November-08, 06:27
aguahombre, on 2011-November-07, 09:27, said:
If that is your agreement, you still can delay Texas to hearts. With a four card major and diamonds, the puppeteer could have shown which major by bidding the other one, then removed 3NT to 4D.
If 3NT is your partnership's answer to puppet with this hand, I wouldn't know whether 4D is delay Texas or not. Maybe that is one reason people are using 3D as either/or.
I didn't know about the 3D reply ...( I know aboout Muppet to solve the 5s/4h problem... and I knew about the 4M/6m problem with Puppet and Muppet ).
I like solution to the 4M/6m problem.
But what is the bid after 3D to show BOTH Majors ? [ I assume 3NT! = both Majors, pick one if you have one ].
It used to be:
2NT - 3C (Puppet)
3D( no 5M, but at least one 4M ) - 4D! ( I have both, pick one )
TWOferBRIDGE
"imo by far in bridge the least understood concept is how to bid over a jump-shift
( 1M-1NT!-3m-?? )." ....Justin Lall
" Did someone mention relays? " .... Zelandakh
K-Rex to Mikeh : " Sometimes you drive me nuts " .
#9
Posted 2011-November-08, 09:10
TWO4BRIDGE, on 2011-November-08, 06:27, said:
It used to be:
2NT - 3C (Puppet)
3D( no 5M, but at least one 4M ) - 4D! ( I have both, pick one )
Good question. I always felt that:
--if 3D doesn't guarantee a major, 4D cannot be used to ask for a pick between them.
--if 3D does gurarantee a major, 4D should still be used for something else; and responder--with 4-4M can show spades and choose to live with 3N or pull to the known heart fit. Yes, this instance would wrong-side; but it keeps another desciptor bid in play to compensate.
#10
Posted 2011-November-08, 09:36
#11
Posted 2011-November-08, 10:06
#12
Posted 2011-November-08, 10:11
I think we have gotten past the first subject.
#13
Posted 2011-November-08, 15:50
aguahombre, on 2011-November-08, 10:11, said:
how to handle puppet follow-ups.
I have another question.... for both ZEL and AQUAman ...
In your structures, does the Puppeteer ALWAYS guarantee at least one 4 card Major ?
Or can Responder bid 3C on say 3-3 in the Majors -- looking for a 5 card Major with Opener ?
Because as I see it, there seems to be a problem with stopping in 3NT when Responder does NOT have a 4M and no 3-5 fit..... and that is because 3NT! is
systemic showing some type of Major holding.
TWOferBRIDGE
"imo by far in bridge the least understood concept is how to bid over a jump-shift
( 1M-1NT!-3m-?? )." ....Justin Lall
" Did someone mention relays? " .... Zelandakh
K-Rex to Mikeh : " Sometimes you drive me nuts " .
#14
Posted 2011-November-08, 18:56
TWO4BRIDGE, on 2011-November-08, 15:50, said:
In your structures, does the Puppeteer ALWAYS guarantee at least one 4 card Major ?
Or can Responder bid 3C on say 3-3 in the Majors -- looking for a 5 card Major with Opener ?
Because as I see it, there seems to be a problem with stopping in 3NT when Responder does NOT have a 4M and no 3-5 fit..... and that is because 3NT! is
systemic showing some type of Major holding.
Dunno for Zel, but 3C is mandatory for us with a 3 card major...and sometimes with HX HX in the majors. 2NT-3NT can be removed!
#15
Posted 2011-November-09, 05:38
aguahombre, on 2011-November-07, 09:27, said:
I'm losing sleep over this.
If 3D = no 5M, but MAY have 4M, how do you handle the problem 5s/4h hand with Responder ?
2NT - 3C
3D - ??
TWOferBRIDGE
"imo by far in bridge the least understood concept is how to bid over a jump-shift
( 1M-1NT!-3m-?? )." ....Justin Lall
" Did someone mention relays? " .... Zelandakh
K-Rex to Mikeh : " Sometimes you drive me nuts " .
#16
Posted 2011-November-09, 07:19
TWO4BRIDGE, on 2011-November-09, 05:38, said:
If 3D = no 5M, but MAY have 4M, how do you handle the problem 5s/4h hand with Responder ?
2NT - 3C
3D - ??
It is not uncommon to use a 3NT response to 2NT to cover this hand. If you forget and pass then you have to buy your partner a beer! I suspect Agua uses this method from his comment thatt 3NT can be removed. His treatment of 3C is unusual though - most players I know that use a conventional 3NT response also play 3S as a puppet to 3NT.
Because my 3NT is natural I only need to bid 3C when I am interested in a fit. With 3-2 or 3-3 majors then you look at your hand to see if you would prefer to play in the possible 5-3 fit or 3NT. If it is 50-50 then plump for 3NT. If you have such a hand and Opener rebids 3D then you bid 3H and either convert 3S to 3NT or pass 3NT. Yes, this does have the disadvantage of revealing whether Opener has a 4 card spade suit. Also, remember that in my structure the 3D rebid promises 3-4 spades and/or 4 hearts. Therefore it is safe to bid above 3NT with the 5 spades-4 hearts hand. Note also that this is not my invention - the base convention is written up on David Stevenson's website. I have embellished it a little in places to personal taste though.
#17
Posted 2011-November-09, 13:46
Normal stayman over 2NT FTW!
#18
Posted 2011-November-09, 13:54
olien, on 2011-November-09, 13:46, said:
3♣ asking for a major, 3♦ no 4 card major (with smolen), 3♥ 4-5 hearts, 3♠ 5 spades, 3N 4 spades (or the other way around) is a good compromise I think.
George Carlin
#19
Posted 2011-November-10, 10:11
- hrothgar
#20
Posted 2011-November-10, 10:56
TWO4BRIDGE, on 2011-November-09, 05:38, said:
If 3D = no 5M, but MAY have 4M, how do you handle the problem 5s/4h hand with Responder ?
2NT - 3C
3D - ??
Even though I brought up that this treatment (nebulous 3D) is played, I don't use it (yet); hence I didn't answer. We will both have to try aspirin for sleep.
Actually, we are considering reverting to non-puppet because of uneven major issues, and re-adopting Smolen/delay Texas follow-ups after 3C plus extended Walsh Relays after a 3D xfer. We will lose an occasional 5-3 fit where opener has five, but gain in other cases.