BBO Discussion Forums: Leaping response to Michaels? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Leaping response to Michaels?

#1 User is offline   Bbradley62 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,542
  • Joined: 2010-February-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brooklyn, NY, USA

Posted 2011-November-04, 09:06

4?

0

#2 User is offline   barmar 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 21,603
  • Joined: 2004-August-21
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2011-November-04, 10:39

The book bid is 2, but simulations push it up to 4. I think the double fit is what makes this preferable. If it just bids 2, it expects that the opponents are going to compete. It's expecting South to be at least 5-5 in the majors. So EW have at least an 8-card diamond fit, and probably 9 or 10; they'll be able to find it given room. It's a preemptive bid, not based on strength. And since it comes from a simulation, the description doesn't match its actual hand (but South's hand doesn't match its bid, either).

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

3 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users