[Bussy]

Hi there,

two very interesting bids of my Robot-Pd here:

No.1:
No.2:

Regards
Bussy

[Bbradley62]

Is Roboter Robot's French cousin?

[Bussy]

I asked him if he is French but unfortunately he does not answer me!
(German cousin)

[cloa513]

Bussy, on 2011-November-02, 15:47, said:

Hi there,

two very interesting bids of my Robot-Pd here:

No.1:
No.2:

Regards
Bussy

The first one is clearly human has to correct back to 2♠ and hopeful GIB gives a decent bid then.

The second one is clearly what part of forcing 1NT don't you understand GIB.

[georgi]

Bussy, on 2011-November-02, 15:47, said:

Hi there,

two very interesting bids of my Robot-Pd here:

No.1:
No.2:

Regards
Bussy

Thanks for reporting this. Both have same issue with problems with overly loaded hands rebid by opener. It will be fixed.

[barmar]

Not that it excuses the robot's pass, but I wonder why you bid 1NT on the second hand instead of 2♠. Did you really upgrade that hand to a limit raise?

[Bussy]

Hey,

ignore my bid pls here. This was not the point, but the re-bid. (My hand would have been look different)
My personal original question was: "What is the best rebid for a 21-22 Total Points (6+ Spades) Hand after a 1NT response, so I have tested it on a training table, cause 2/1-GIB-CoCa says:
3♠: 17-20 Total Points, 6+ ♠....
4♠: ?? Total Points, 7+♠..., but 15- HCP

[barmar]

Georgi already answered your original question. I said that my question about your bid had nothing to do with GIB's misbids.

[Bussy]

barmar, on 2011-November-03, 13:50, said:

Did you really upgrade that hand to a limit raise?

There was a misunderstanding maybe. I did not, I wanted to lie cause I was just interested in Robot's re-bid.
I did not find any adequate re-bid for a 21-22 Total Points, 6+ ♠ (unbalanced) hand after Pd's "Forcing NT "and apparently Robot did not find any bid, too. (Georgi explained it)
All in all it was a funny and not senseless research.

Regards Bussy

[barmar]

What do you think about adjusting the requirements for opening 2♣ to include hands like these?

[Bbradley62]

No. 2 looks like a 2♣ opening to me, but No. 1 doesn't.