BBO Discussion Forums: Rollover descriptions seems to need fixing - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Rollover descriptions seems to need fixing

#1 User is offline   myprac 

  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 61
  • Joined: 2011-October-28

Posted 2011-November-01, 12:33

My link

No complaint about the bid, but the rollover description is completely wrong. Have observed the same in spades.
0

#2 User is offline   barmar 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 21,594
  • Joined: 2004-August-21
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2011-November-01, 15:47

The problem is that GIB doesn't have a good way of describing bids that have multiple, disjoint meanings. You raise a preempt to game EITHER because you have a weak hand with good support and you're increasing the preempt (that's the LAW), OR because you have a strong hand and at least an 8-card fit. The description then becomes the lowest common denominator of both rules: you have to have at least 2 trumps (if you have a strong hand) and at least 4 points (if you have good trump support). And it also mentions "The Law" because this description is attached to one of the matching bidding rules.
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users