What is the 4♣ call?
What does this bid show? Is this a splinter?
#3
Posted 2011-October-19, 05:56
#4
Posted 2011-October-19, 20:49
#5
Posted 2011-October-23, 18:28
is a not dissimilar auction. I am told this is played as showing six diamonds and five spades in Surrey, and a splinter for hearts in other English counties. Which is why I was surprised by one of the votes for a splinter in competition.
#6
Posted 2011-October-23, 18:34
lamford, on 2011-October-23, 18:28, said:
is a similar auction. I am told this is played as showing six diamonds and five spades in Surrey, and a splinter for hearts in other English counties. Which is why I was surprised by one of the votes for a splinter in competition.
It is not even remotely similar fyi.
In the OP example , opener is jump bidding a suit which was implied by pd, or at least was not implied by opponents, while in your example opener is jump bidding a suit implied by opponents and not pd.
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#7
Posted 2011-October-23, 18:37
MrAce, on 2011-October-23, 18:34, said:
In the OP example , opener is jump bidding a suit which was implied by pd, or at least was not implied by opponents, while in your example opener is jump bidding a suit implied by opponents and not pd.
Therefore the splinter interpretation should be more likely in the second example. But I agree that the auctions are different, although the doubler in the second example hand does not have to have spades, just as the doubler in the OP does not need to have clubs.
#8
Posted 2011-October-24, 01:26
lamford, on 2011-October-23, 18:28, said:
is a not dissimilar auction. I am told this is played as showing six diamonds and five spades in Surrey, and a splinter for hearts in other English counties. Which is why I was surprised by one of the votes for a splinter in competition.
3S is a splinter because 2S (a reverse) would be forcing. 4C in this auction is not a splinter because 3C (the minimum bid of a suit) is NF.
#9
Posted 2011-October-24, 02:21
JLOGIC, on 2011-October-24, 01:26, said:
Indeed, and in the case to which Lamford refers the main argument for treating 3♠ as natural was that 2♠ would have been non-forcing.
#10
Posted 2011-October-24, 18:19
for partner's hearts.
That makes others go through 2NT (good/bad) ie.
Long diamonds, Strong bal, Big 2nd suit. Or lower bids.
#11
Posted 2011-October-25, 08:12
lamford, on 2011-October-23, 18:28, said:
is a not dissimilar auction. I am told this is played as showing six diamonds and five spades in Surrey, and a splinter for hearts in other English counties. Which is why I was surprised by one of the votes for a splinter in competition.
Agree with MrAce ( ie your example is in no way similar ).
And in your example, 4C! ( instead of 3S ) would be a jump-cue splinter for Hts.
TWOferBRIDGE
"imo by far in bridge the least understood concept is how to bid over a jump-shift
( 1M-1NT!-3m-?? )." ....Justin Lall
" Did someone mention relays? " .... Zelandakh
K-Rex to Mikeh : " Sometimes you drive me nuts " .
#12
Posted 2011-October-25, 11:31
dboxley, on 2011-October-19, 20:49, said:
Because of the likelihood of more competitition by the opponents, I believe the GB 2NT should be single-suited diamonds (weaker than 3D); 3C competitive in clubs; and 4C, as others say, strong 2-suiter.
This way, your partner is in on what is happening when the opponents raise the level in their suit.
#13
Posted 2011-October-25, 15:25
#14
Posted 2011-October-27, 03:35
whereagles, on 2011-October-25, 15:25, said:
So what would you take
1♦-1♥-x-2♥
4♥
as? Or maybe I'm misunderstanding the word "inferred".
George Carlin
#15
Posted 2011-October-27, 03:41
#16
Posted 2011-October-27, 03:45
gwnn, on 2011-October-27, 03:35, said:
1♦-1♥-x-2♥
4♥
as? Or maybe I'm misunderstanding the word "inferred".
Probably a splinter, though I wouldn't be 100% sure on the suit. Could be spades, could be a minor, who knows? I would definitely avoid making such a bid if I had an alternative.
By the way, what's about quantum chemistry? lol
#17
Posted 2011-October-27, 07:49
gwnn, on 2011-October-27, 03:35, said:
1♦-1♥-x-2♥
4♥
as? Or maybe I'm misunderstanding the word "inferred".
this is clearer than the OP's auction. A splinter for ♠
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw