BBO Discussion Forums: Rebid? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Rebid?

#21 User is offline   aguahombre 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,029
  • Joined: 2009-February-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St. George, UT

Posted 2011-September-14, 17:59

View Postwhereagles, on 2011-September-14, 17:49, said:

I don't understand. Why is 2H forbidden?

It is not forbidden. However, some might think overstating values to reverse into a suit partner cannot have unless he also has an 8-card fit in spades might get the partnership beyond its level.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
0

#22 User is offline   the hog 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-March-07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Laos
  • Interests:Wagner and Bridge

Posted 2011-September-14, 18:28

View Postpooltuna, on 2011-September-14, 08:54, said:

okay. What word would you use to describe a call that is a card short of what your system notes say is promised?


My system notes don't promise 4. If yours do then it is a lie for YOU, but certainly not for everyody.
"The King of Hearts a broadsword bears, the Queen of Hearts a rose." W. H. Auden.
0

#23 User is offline   pooltuna 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,814
  • Joined: 2009-July-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New Orleans

Posted 2011-September-14, 20:25

View Postthe hog, on 2011-September-14, 18:28, said:

My system notes don't promise 4. If yours do then it is a lie for YOU, but certainly not for everyody.


It is not a lie for me but the OP says 2 promises 4 in his system. I am advocating bidding 2 even tho it promises 4. And you should be trying to solve his problem because nobody here (well at least me) gives a sh-- how you play 2 in your system. Maybe you are suggesting the OP should modify his system...if so just SAY SO.
"Tell me of your home world, Usul"
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"

"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."

George Bernard Shaw
0

#24 User is online   mike777 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 16,857
  • Joined: 2003-October-07
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2011-September-14, 20:33

On going debate on just how "lite" a reverse should be played.
0

#25 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2011-September-15, 02:39

If the original poster just wanted to know what his system notes said about this sequence, presumably he could simply have read them for himself.

Assuming that the question is "What's the best way to handle this type of hand?", I think it's best to bid 2. If you reverse on this hand you make the range of the reverse horribly wide.

Quote

2S would be a huge underbid, 4S has an excellent play facing Axxxx Qx xxx Qxx.

I think that's worth a move after 1-1;2. You know you're opposite either a strong notrump or an unbalanced hand with clubs, and in the latter case Qxx is a pretty good holding.

The problem is worse in a strong-notrump framework, where I'd still raise to 2 as opener, but would pass 2 with the miracle eight-count.

Quote

On going debate on just how "lite" a reverse should be played.

The answer should vary according to the system, but not in the way that some posters seem to think. Playing a weak notrump, 1-1;2 has a higher upper limit, so you should be less inclined to reverse on this shape than when playing a strong notrump.

This post has been edited by gnasher: 2011-September-15, 02:43

... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
1

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

6 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 6 guests, 0 anonymous users