how do you open this, and why if at all
#2
Posted 2004-September-27, 18:49
KNR calls it 11.6, for what its worth.
#3
Posted 2004-September-27, 19:13
#4
Posted 2004-September-27, 19:21
Of course, it *should* be opened 1NT

Peter
#5
Posted 2004-September-27, 21:08
I prefer more solid openings in 2/1.
#6
Posted 2004-September-27, 23:09

#7
Posted 2004-September-27, 23:36
The_Hog, on Sep 28 2004, 01:13 AM, said:
I wonder...
If you are not playing a weak NT, then this sort of hand has to be opened with 1 of a minor.
This certainly makes it easier for LHO to overcall on a number of major suit hands on which they would be unable to open. Do the gains outweigh the losses?
The hand certainly has less going for it than eg ♠KJxx ♥AQxx ♦xx ♣Qxx
Eric
#8
Posted 2004-September-28, 00:12
This approach is far too negative Eric; I could be hit by a bus when I am crossing the road, but that does not stop me from crossing it. Pass this hand and you will find it hard to convince partner you have these values later in the auction. If pd opens 1S you may survive with gadgets like Drury. If pd opens 1H what do you do? Bid 2m? Do you now blame pd for passing a 13 pt opener with no wonderful fit for you? Another 3NT gurgles down the drain.
Maybe you will find some French and US experts passing this as some of these are very conservative in their openings; those players who play a 4 handed rather than 2 handed game will open.
#9
Posted 2004-September-28, 00:27
BTW, least anyone think I always advocate conservatism, note that I will open 2S at both vulnerable with KQTxx xxx xxx xx and often blast to slams.
#10
Posted 2004-September-28, 02:05
I can understand you not opening 1 Major on an 11 count, as a 2/1 bid may get you overboard, but surely in a sequence like 1C 1M 1N you can checkback with 2C to ask for range and support; I am afraid I don't get it.
Ron.
#11
Posted 2004-September-28, 03:33
The_Hog, on Sep 28 2004, 03:05 AM, said:
I can understand you not opening 1 Major on an 11 count, as a 2/1 bid may get you overboard, but surely in a sequence like 1C 1M 1N you can checkback with 2C to ask for range and support; I am afraid I don't get it.
Ron.
I've just found that people who play 2/1 prefer solid openings. While it's true that, unlike 1♦-2♣, there is no GF bid over 1C, that doesn't mean that I use a different range for it.
#12
Posted 2004-September-28, 03:49
the only good comes when your holding surprises the ops... but i just think more good can come from bidding this than passing it, especially if you can open 1nt
#13
Posted 2004-September-28, 03:51
Now 1c/1d ? i think there are advance to each, more important that you will agree with partner on it.
This post has been edited by Flame: 2004-September-28, 07:21
#14
Posted 2004-September-28, 03:53
Given the vulnerabilty, I might open this hand 1♠ in 3rd seat. It's only half a psyche so I'm allowed to do it four times even when playing under psyche quotas.

#15
Posted 2004-September-28, 05:30
The_Hog, on Sep 28 2004, 06:12 AM, said:
This approach is far too negative Eric; I could be hit by a bus when I am crossing the road, but that does not stop me from crossing it. Pass this hand and you will find it hard to convince partner you have these values later in the auction. If pd opens 1S you may survive with gadgets like Drury. If pd opens 1H what do you do? Bid 2m? Do you now blame pd for passing a 13 pt opener with no wonderful fit for you? Another 3NT gurgles down the drain.
Maybe you will find some French and US experts passing this as some of these are very conservative in their openings; those players who play a 4 handed rather than 2 handed game will open.
I would certainly open it. But I would like to open it with 1NT! I can remember hands like this where a 1NT opening led to a good result, but a 1m opening would have led to their finding a major part score. I suspect that a Pass might have led to the hands being thrown in (again for a good score).
But I would be interested if anyone could demonstrate whether in "real-life" bridge, opening balanced 12 point hands without a major suit does gain or lose IMPS/MPS.
Perhaps someone with BridgeBrowser or equivalent can do that.
Eric
#16
Posted 2004-September-28, 06:14
#17
Posted 2004-September-28, 06:31
If I open i would open 1C, not 1D.Why?
If partner bids 1D over 1C, I will bid 2D
If parntre bids 1H ove 1C, I will bid 1NT
If partner bids 1S ove 1C, I will bid 2S
If I open 1D, I will not be bidding 2C so, why open the higher suit? I have a better chance of finding our minor suit fit with a 1C opening bid.. .
#18
Posted 2004-September-28, 06:50
scoob, on Sep 28 2004, 03:25 AM, said:
I'd (reluctantly) open 1♦ playing 2/1
The hand is a piece of *****, but the benefits of opening outweigh the costs.
MUCH happier to be dealt this is playing a weak NT system...
#19
Posted 2004-September-28, 10:10

#20
Posted 2004-September-28, 10:30
2nd question which suit to open? i prefer 1d. Fred said a lot about this question.