Friend of mine introduced me to this neat little gadget the other day. Basically, instead of normal "four suit transfers", you bid 2
♠ with one of three hand types: a balanced raise to 2NT (inviting game) with no four card major, a weak signoff in clubs, a single-suited slam try in clubs. You bid 2NT with one of three hand types: a weak minor two suiter, a weak signoff in diamonds, or a single-suited slam try in diamonds.
Over 2
♠, opener bids 2NT with a minimum, and 3
♣ with a maximum. Responder can pass 2NT or bid 3
♣ to show the weak signoff, or bid anything else to show the slam try. Over 3
♣ he bids 3NT, passes, or bids anything else.
Over 2NT opener bids his best minor. Responder with the weak two suiter passes, with the diamond signoff corrects or passes, and with the slam try does anything else.
All well and good, but I got to thinking (frequently a mistake on my part
![:D](http://www.bridgebase.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
). Playing four suit transfers, the sequence 1NT-2
♣-2
♥-2
♠ is necessary to avoid missing a possible spade fit, and 1NT-2
♣-2
♥-2NT denies a four card major. But that latter hand, playing Boston Jacoby, will bid 1NT-2
♠-2NT/3
♣-Pass/3NT. So 1NT-2
♣-2
♥-2NT
shows four spades. So 1NT-
♣-2
♥-2
♠ is a redundant sequence.
What do we do with it?
Is there anything useful we can do?