Page 1 of 1
What is this bid?
#1
Posted 2011-July-19, 16:33
What does the 3 bid show?
Pass-(1♣)-2♦-(X)
3♠?
Your side favourable, IMPs. Disagreement with my p here, so would like to know what you think this bid shows =)
Pass-(1♣)-2♦-(X)
3♠?
Your side favourable, IMPs. Disagreement with my p here, so would like to know what you think this bid shows =)
#2
Posted 2011-July-19, 17:06
The 3S bidder has passed, so he can't have a weak hand with long spades.
So I would take this as lead directing with a diamond fit.
So I would take this as lead directing with a diamond fit.
--
Finding your own mistakes is more productive than looking for partner's. It improves your game and is good for your soul. (Nige1)
Finding your own mistakes is more productive than looking for partner's. It improves your game and is good for your soul. (Nige1)
#3
Posted 2011-July-19, 17:52
Will pard open 3s with an outside ace? I play no so my guess is pard has long spades and an outside ace
Kxxxxxx..x...xx...Axx or other type hands with a poor spade suit or an outside a or k.
Kxxxxxx..x...xx...Axx or other type hands with a poor spade suit or an outside a or k.
#4
Posted 2011-July-19, 18:21
Its a lead director with at least enough diamond support for a raise to 4. Disagree with anyone that suggests this is fitted.
Hi y'all!
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#6
Posted 2011-July-19, 20:27
dicklont, on 2011-July-19, 17:06, said:
The 3S bidder has passed, so he can't have a weak hand with long spades.
So I would take this as lead directing with a diamond fit.
So I would take this as lead directing with a diamond fit.
He can have a weak hand with lots of spades if he never preempts with 4 or more of the other major but why bid at the 3 level over a hand that most likely has four of at least one major.
#10
Posted 2011-July-20, 06:05
Spade values and a diamond fit.
With a single suiter, he could have bid 2S.
A 2S instead of a 3S bid, which, although NF, also would have shown some
values, and a long suit.
I also belong in the camp, that say, if you did not open with a preempt,
you cant show it later.
We prefer our points in the suit, so if p would have a spade preempt,
his suit has to be lousy, so why should he introduce a lousy suit on
the 3 level, with no gurantee of a fit.
But this point is not relevant here, since a 2S bid was av.
With kind regards
Marlowe
With a single suiter, he could have bid 2S.
A 2S instead of a 3S bid, which, although NF, also would have shown some
values, and a long suit.
I also belong in the camp, that say, if you did not open with a preempt,
you cant show it later.
We prefer our points in the suit, so if p would have a spade preempt,
his suit has to be lousy, so why should he introduce a lousy suit on
the 3 level, with no gurantee of a fit.
But this point is not relevant here, since a 2S bid was av.
With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#11
Posted 2011-July-20, 06:56
P_Marlowe, on 2011-July-20, 06:05, said:
I also belong in the camp, that say, if you did not open with a preempt,
you cant show it later.
We prefer our points in the suit, so if p would have a spade preempt,
his suit has to be lousy, so why should he introduce a lousy suit on
the 3 level, with no guarantee of a fit.
But this point is not relevant here, since a 2S bid was av.
With kind regards
Marlowe
This fits my thinking also and, I think, applies fairly generally. Coming in later with a two-suiter may be right, but for one-suited preempts my policy is do do it right away or not do it. For reasons that others may or may not agree with I tend not to start the bidding at the three level when I have a side suit void. But then later, having not done it at my first go, I shut up.
So if I bid that way I would have some sort of spade values and a diamond fit. I wouldn't trot it out undiscussed though.
Ken
Page 1 of 1